2021
Youngs, Richard; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Reversing the Democratic Gaze Online
2021.
@online{Youngs2021,
title = {Reversing the Democratic Gaze},
author = {Richard Youngs and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://carnegieeurope.eu/2021/11/24/reversing-democratic-gaze-pub-85840},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-11-24},
journal = {Carnegie Europe},
abstract = {Alongside its traditional external democracy support, the EU needs to begin drawing on lessons and influences from other countries to help address Europe’s own democracy problems.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Alongside its traditional external democracy support, the EU needs to begin drawing on lessons and influences from other countries to help address Europe’s own democracy problems.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Magnette, Paul
How do we fix Europe’s presidency dilemma? Online
Open Democracy 2021.
@online{Nicolaïdis2021b,
title = {How do we fix Europe’s presidency dilemma?},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Paul Magnette},
url = {https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/how-do-we-fix-europes-presidency-dilemma/},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-07-01},
organization = {Open Democracy},
abstract = {A single president, elected by almost 500 million, would not be an appropriate solution for the EU},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
A single president, elected by almost 500 million, would not be an appropriate solution for the EU
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The Democratic Panopticon Online
NOEMA 2021.
@online{Nicolaidïs2021bb,
title = {The Democratic Panopticon},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.noemamag.com/the-democratic-panopticon/},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-07-00},
organization = {NOEMA},
abstract = {Harnessing our collective power and intelligence to create a culture of digitally enhanced citizen participation across borders.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Harnessing our collective power and intelligence to create a culture of digitally enhanced citizen participation across borders.
Bercero, Ignacio Garcia; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The power surplus: Brussels calling, legal empathy and the trade-regulation nexus Journal Article
In: EUI, Technical Report, CEPS Policy Insights, PI 2021/05, STG Report, 2021.
@article{Bercero2021,
title = {The power surplus: Brussels calling, legal empathy and the trade-regulation nexus},
author = {Ignacio Garcia Bercero and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/70675},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-05-00},
journal = {EUI, Technical Report, CEPS Policy Insights, PI 2021/05, STG Report},
abstract = {The EU may not be a superpower but it holds a ‘power surplus’ when it comes to the trade-regulatory nexus. The strategic challenges posed by the deployment of this power surplus are the subject of this paper, which argues that in order to be a responsible regulatory power and positively influence the multilateral agenda, the EU needs to develop a coherent overall approach to the external dimension of its regulatory policies. In this spirit, and in most cases, the EU would be ill advised to project itself as a model or to seek to ‘weaponise’ its regulatory powers in pursuit of unrelated foreign policy goals. Instead, it should wield this power to enhance the regulatory compatibility between its own and others’ jurisdictions through cooperation rather than relying on the passive market-based influence of the so-called Brussels effect. This is simply a way to be faithful to its core defining philosophy of legal empathy. The CEPS Policy Insight by authors Ignacio Garcia Bercero and Kalypso Nicolaides offers a typology of different forms of external EU regulatory impact, a discussion of the risks of either underuse or overuse of the regulatory power surplus, and considers the ‘good global governance’ model implied by a principled geopolitical role. It moves on to discuss a unifying conceptual framework to encompass this approach, under the umbrella of ‘managed mutual recognition’ as the operationalisation of legal empathy. It concludes with six specific suggestions as to how the EU can best exercise its regulatory power through a closer integration of trade and regulatory policies.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The EU may not be a superpower but it holds a ‘power surplus’ when it comes to the trade-regulatory nexus. The strategic challenges posed by the deployment of this power surplus are the subject of this paper, which argues that in order to be a responsible regulatory power and positively influence the multilateral agenda, the EU needs to develop a coherent overall approach to the external dimension of its regulatory policies. In this spirit, and in most cases, the EU would be ill advised to project itself as a model or to seek to ‘weaponise’ its regulatory powers in pursuit of unrelated foreign policy goals. Instead, it should wield this power to enhance the regulatory compatibility between its own and others’ jurisdictions through cooperation rather than relying on the passive market-based influence of the so-called Brussels effect. This is simply a way to be faithful to its core defining philosophy of legal empathy. The CEPS Policy Insight by authors Ignacio Garcia Bercero and Kalypso Nicolaides offers a typology of different forms of external EU regulatory impact, a discussion of the risks of either underuse or overuse of the regulatory power surplus, and considers the ‘good global governance’ model implied by a principled geopolitical role. It moves on to discuss a unifying conceptual framework to encompass this approach, under the umbrella of ‘managed mutual recognition’ as the operationalisation of legal empathy. It concludes with six specific suggestions as to how the EU can best exercise its regulatory power through a closer integration of trade and regulatory policies.
Merdzanovic, Adis; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Advocacy for a citizen-centric rule of law agenda: How do we bring the rule of law to life? Journal Article
In: Eur Law J. 2021;1–9., 2021.
@article{Merdzanovic2021,
title = {Advocacy for a citizen-centric rule of law agenda: How do we bring the rule of law to life?},
author = {Adis Merdzanovic and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/RoL-Article.pdf},
doi = {10.1111/eulj.12385},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-04-13},
journal = {Eur Law J. 2021;1–9.},
abstract = {How do we best defend the rule of law against its attackers, both within the European Union and outside of it? Often, the rule of law has been perceived as a domain belonging to jurists, lawyers, bureaucrats, or politicians. Yet at its most fundamental, the rule of law needs to be thought of from a citizen's perspective. When enforced, it guarantees freedoms and liberties for citizens and enables us to live peacefully. In this article, we propose a citizen-centric rule of law agenda based on a deep conviction that it is if and when it becomes a citizen-based societal principle that its many attackers are best countered. We discuss the challenges and necessities of rule of law promotion and propose an assessment approach called the “living list”. We close with a call for citizen-scholars to fight for the rule of law, the most precious human invention of all time.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
How do we best defend the rule of law against its attackers, both within the European Union and outside of it? Often, the rule of law has been perceived as a domain belonging to jurists, lawyers, bureaucrats, or politicians. Yet at its most fundamental, the rule of law needs to be thought of from a citizen's perspective. When enforced, it guarantees freedoms and liberties for citizens and enables us to live peacefully. In this article, we propose a citizen-centric rule of law agenda based on a deep conviction that it is if and when it becomes a citizen-based societal principle that its many attackers are best countered. We discuss the challenges and necessities of rule of law promotion and propose an assessment approach called the “living list”. We close with a call for citizen-scholars to fight for the rule of law, the most precious human invention of all time.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Merdzanovic, Adis
A Citizen’s Guide to the Rule of Law Book
ibidem Press, 2021, ISBN: 9783838215419.
@book{Nicolaidïs2021,
title = {A Citizen’s Guide to the Rule of Law},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Adis Merdzanovic},
editor = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Adis Merdzanovic},
url = {http://cup.columbia.edu/book/rule-of-law/9783838215419},
isbn = {9783838215419},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-04-00},
booktitle = {A Citizen’s Guide to the Rule of Law – Why We Need to Fight for the Most Precious Human Invention of All Time},
pages = {180 pages},
publisher = {ibidem Press},
abstract = {In our daily lives, the rule of law matters more than anything and yet remains an invisible presence. We trust in the rule of law to protect us from governmental overreach, mafia godfathers, or the will of the majority. We take the rule of law for granted, often failing to recognize its demise—until it is too late. For under attack it is, not only in the growing number of authoritarian countries around the world but in Europe, too.
As a citizen’s guide, this book explains in plain language what the rule of law is, why it matters, and why we have to defend it. The starting point is to ask why EU efforts to promote the rule of law in candidate countries have succeeded or failed, and what this tells us about what is happening inside the EU. The authors move on to suggest ways of strengthening the rule of law in Europe and beyond. This book is a call to action in defense of the most precious human invention of all time.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
In our daily lives, the rule of law matters more than anything and yet remains an invisible presence. We trust in the rule of law to protect us from governmental overreach, mafia godfathers, or the will of the majority. We take the rule of law for granted, often failing to recognize its demise—until it is too late. For under attack it is, not only in the growing number of authoritarian countries around the world but in Europe, too.
As a citizen’s guide, this book explains in plain language what the rule of law is, why it matters, and why we have to defend it. The starting point is to ask why EU efforts to promote the rule of law in candidate countries have succeeded or failed, and what this tells us about what is happening inside the EU. The authors move on to suggest ways of strengthening the rule of law in Europe and beyond. This book is a call to action in defense of the most precious human invention of all time.
As a citizen’s guide, this book explains in plain language what the rule of law is, why it matters, and why we have to defend it. The starting point is to ask why EU efforts to promote the rule of law in candidate countries have succeeded or failed, and what this tells us about what is happening inside the EU. The authors move on to suggest ways of strengthening the rule of law in Europe and beyond. This book is a call to action in defense of the most precious human invention of all time.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Onar, Nora Fisher
The Decentering Agenda: Europe as A Post-Colonial Power Book Chapter
In: Gstöhl, Sieglinde; Schunz, Simon (Ed.): Studying the European Union’s External Action: Concepts, Approaches, Theories, Macmillian Academic, 2021.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2021bb,
title = {The Decentering Agenda: Europe as A Post-Colonial Power},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Nora Fisher Onar},
editor = {Sieglinde Gstöhl and Simon Schunz},
url = {https://www.amazon.co.uk/External-Action-European-Union-Approaches/dp/135201212X},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-00-00},
booktitle = {Studying the European Union’s External Action: Concepts, Approaches, Theories},
publisher = {Macmillian Academic},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Youth as redeemer Online
LSE, Conflict and Civil Society 2021.
@online{Nicolaidïs2021bb,
title = {Youth as redeemer},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/eftm-future-democracy.pdf},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-00-00},
organization = {LSE, Conflict and Civil Society},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
2020
Azmanova, Albena; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The rule of law: a simple phrase with exacting demands Online
Social Europe 2020.
@online{Azmanova2020,
title = {The rule of law: a simple phrase with exacting demands},
author = {Albena Azmanova and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.socialeurope.eu/the-rule-of-law-a-simple-phrase-with-exacting-demands},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-11-00},
organization = {Social Europe},
abstract = {If the finger is to be pointed—rightly—at Hungary and Poland, then the EU must insist on compliance by all with universal norms.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
If the finger is to be pointed—rightly—at Hungary and Poland, then the EU must insist on compliance by all with universal norms.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
From Oedipus to coronavirus: Homo Sapiens and the making of scapegoats Online
Open Democracy 2020, visited: 07.09.2020.
@online{Nicolaidïs2020,
title = {From Oedipus to coronavirus: Homo Sapiens and the making of scapegoats},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/oedipus-coronavirus-homo-sapiens-and-making-scapegoats/?source=wa},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-09-07},
urldate = {2020-09-07},
organization = {Open Democracy},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Kant’s Mantle: Cosmopolitanism, Federalism and Constitutionalism as European Ideologies Journal Article
In: Journal of European Public Policy, 27 (9), pp. 1307-1328, 2020.
@article{Nicolaidïs2020d,
title = {Kant’s Mantle: Cosmopolitanism, Federalism and Constitutionalism as European Ideologies},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Kant-s-mantle-cosmopolitanism-federalism-and-constitutionalism-as-European-ideologies.pdf},
doi = {10.1080/13501763.2020.1786596},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-08-00},
journal = {Journal of European Public Policy},
volume = {27},
number = {9},
pages = {1307-1328},
abstract = {This article explores the ways cosmopolitanism, federalism and constitutionalism have evolved in Europe from core philosophical concepts to political programmes, and ultimately ‘ideological benchmarks’ with highly contested meanings. I identify three alternative intellectual strategies for their appropriation, and through them the appropriation of ‘Kant’s mantle’, which both reflect and affect the EU public sphere. In the process, I ask how they can serve as resources conceptually to ground a third way for Europe. First, essentialist strategies appeal to affinities with the essence of these traditions, an essence anterior to or distinct from the particular variant of the ‘state writ large’ with which they might be identified in the public and scholarly imagination. Second, composite strategies employ various modifiers to deflect criticism. Thirdly, pollination strategies retain the flavor and questions raised by the three isms without necessarily coopting their labels.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article explores the ways cosmopolitanism, federalism and constitutionalism have evolved in Europe from core philosophical concepts to political programmes, and ultimately ‘ideological benchmarks’ with highly contested meanings. I identify three alternative intellectual strategies for their appropriation, and through them the appropriation of ‘Kant’s mantle’, which both reflect and affect the EU public sphere. In the process, I ask how they can serve as resources conceptually to ground a third way for Europe. First, essentialist strategies appeal to affinities with the essence of these traditions, an essence anterior to or distinct from the particular variant of the ‘state writ large’ with which they might be identified in the public and scholarly imagination. Second, composite strategies employ various modifiers to deflect criticism. Thirdly, pollination strategies retain the flavor and questions raised by the three isms without necessarily coopting their labels.
Mintz, Rabbi Adam; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Towards the Eruvian Age: Public Space in a Pandemic Online
OpenDemocracy 2020.
@online{Mintz2020,
title = {Towards the Eruvian Age: Public Space in a Pandemic},
author = {Rabbi Adam Mintz and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/coronavirus-towards-eruvian-age/},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-05-00},
organization = {OpenDemocracy},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Brexit negotiations: linkages need to be handled with care Online
UK in a Changing Europe 2020.
@online{Nicolaidïs2020g,
title = {Brexit negotiations: linkages need to be handled with care},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://ukandeu.ac.uk/negotiations-linkages-need-to-be-handled-with-care/},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-03-00},
organization = {UK in a Changing Europe},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
In praise of ambivalence - another Brexit story Journal Article
In: Journal of European Integration, 42 (4), pp. 465-488, 2020.
@article{Nicolaidïs2020b,
title = {In praise of ambivalence - another Brexit story},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Nicolaidis-In-praise-of-ambivalence-another-Brexit-story.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1766456},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-00-00},
journal = {Journal of European Integration},
volume = {42},
number = {4},
pages = {465-488},
abstract = {The paper offers a defence of ambivalence as a response to the political polarisation of our era using multiple languages to present its case from psychology to sociology, political science, philosophy and critical theory. It suggests that the Brexit story can be told in a different key, whereby the politics that have led to entrenching ‘leave’ and ‘remain’ identities overlay a harder to assess ambivalence about the EU both in the UK and in the EU, a dynamic referred to as the ‘Machiavelli Trap.’ Accordingly, we ought to ground the future relationship in the recognition of the ‘Brexit paradox’ (you can leave and therefore you shouldn't), and its implications for the core principles that have shaped the Brexit debate and negotiations. In the end, the paper offers a plea for a politics that allows citizens to tune into their constructive ambivalence about the fundamental tension between control and cooperation which pervades both Brexit, EU and global politics at large.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The paper offers a defence of ambivalence as a response to the political polarisation of our era using multiple languages to present its case from psychology to sociology, political science, philosophy and critical theory. It suggests that the Brexit story can be told in a different key, whereby the politics that have led to entrenching ‘leave’ and ‘remain’ identities overlay a harder to assess ambivalence about the EU both in the UK and in the EU, a dynamic referred to as the ‘Machiavelli Trap.’ Accordingly, we ought to ground the future relationship in the recognition of the ‘Brexit paradox’ (you can leave and therefore you shouldn't), and its implications for the core principles that have shaped the Brexit debate and negotiations. In the end, the paper offers a plea for a politics that allows citizens to tune into their constructive ambivalence about the fundamental tension between control and cooperation which pervades both Brexit, EU and global politics at large.
Nicolaïdis, Kalypso
Bringing Europe Back In: Global IR, Area Studies and the Decentring Agenda (as part of: Does International Relations Need Area Studies?) Journal Article
In: St Antony's International Review (STAIR), 16 (1), pp. 197-206, 2020.
@article{Nicolaidïs2020c,
title = {Bringing Europe Back In: Global IR, Area Studies and the Decentring Agenda (as part of: Does International Relations Need Area Studies?)},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaïdis},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/S3_Nicolaidis_GSarticle.pdf},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-00-00},
journal = {St Antony's International Review (STAIR)},
volume = {16},
number = {1},
pages = {197-206},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Onar, Nora Fisher
The decentering agenda: A post-colonial approach to EU external action Book Chapter
In: Gstöhl, Sieglinde; Schunz, Simon (Ed.): Studying the European Union’s External Action: Concepts, Approaches, Theories, Chapter 15, Macmillian Academic, 2020.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2020e,
title = {The decentering agenda: A post-colonial approach to EU external action},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Nora Fisher Onar},
editor = {Sieglinde Gstöhl and Simon Schunz},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Chapter-15-Fisher-Onar-and-Nicolaidis-final-10.8.pdf},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-00-00},
booktitle = {Studying the European Union’s External Action: Concepts, Approaches, Theories},
publisher = {Macmillian Academic},
chapter = {15},
abstract = {Mainstream studies of European Union (EU) external action are typically Eurocentric, neglecting the perspectives of many to whom such action is directed. This chapter explores the challenges of ‘decentring’ EU external action by importing insights from post-colonial studies into what we call ‘Global EU External Action Studies’. We suggest that when it comes to the EU, the ‘post’ in post-colonialism can refer to two distinct meanings. Analytically, ‘post’-colonial practices refer to the reproduction of hierarchical logics. Normatively, ‘post’-colonialism refers to the desirable transcendence of these logics. We propose a three-step approach to decentring as strategy towards a post-colonial Europe in the second sense: ‘provincializing’ the EU’s experience, ‘engaging’ others’ views, and ‘reconstructing’ EU external action. We then turn to sites where the EU’s external relations have been characteristically Eurocentric, namely Turkey and the Middle East and North Africa. We conclude by identifying possible pathways to reconstructing relations in a ‘multilogical’ fashion.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Mainstream studies of European Union (EU) external action are typically Eurocentric, neglecting the perspectives of many to whom such action is directed. This chapter explores the challenges of ‘decentring’ EU external action by importing insights from post-colonial studies into what we call ‘Global EU External Action Studies’. We suggest that when it comes to the EU, the ‘post’ in post-colonialism can refer to two distinct meanings. Analytically, ‘post’-colonial practices refer to the reproduction of hierarchical logics. Normatively, ‘post’-colonialism refers to the desirable transcendence of these logics. We propose a three-step approach to decentring as strategy towards a post-colonial Europe in the second sense: ‘provincializing’ the EU’s experience, ‘engaging’ others’ views, and ‘reconstructing’ EU external action. We then turn to sites where the EU’s external relations have been characteristically Eurocentric, namely Turkey and the Middle East and North Africa. We conclude by identifying possible pathways to reconstructing relations in a ‘multilogical’ fashion.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Reimagined Democracy in Times of Pandemic Book Chapter
In: Maduro, Miguel; Kahn, Paul (Ed.): Democracy in Times of Pandemic , Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2020, ISBN: 1108845363.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2020f,
title = {Reimagined Democracy in Times of Pandemic},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Miguel Maduro and Paul Kahn},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Reimagined-Democacy-in-Times-of-Pandemic-by-Nicolaidis.pdf},
isbn = {1108845363},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-00-00},
booktitle = {Democracy in Times of Pandemic },
publisher = {Cambridge, Harvard University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Lacey, Joseph; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Democracy and disintegration: Does the state of democracy in the EU put the integrity of the Union at risk? Book Chapter
In: Coman, Ramona; Crespy, Amandine; Schmidt, Vivien (Ed.): Textbook: Politics and Governance in the Post-Crisis, Cambridge University Press, 2020.
@inbook{Lacey2020,
title = {Democracy and disintegration: Does the state of democracy in the EU put the integrity of the Union at risk?},
author = {Joseph Lacey and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Ramona Coman and Amandine Crespy and Vivien Schmidt},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Chapter-19-PROOFS-EU-handbook-Lacey-and-Nicolaidis-2020.pdf},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-00-00},
booktitle = {Textbook: Politics and Governance in the Post-Crisis},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
L’ambition premiere de l’UE devrait etre de devenir la gardienne du long terme Online
France Culture 2020.
@online{Nicolaidïs2020h,
title = {L’ambition premiere de l’UE devrait etre de devenir la gardienne du long terme},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.franceculture.fr/politique/kalypso-nicolaidis-lambition-premiere-de-lue-devait-etre-de-devenir-la-gardienne-du-long-terme},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-00-00},
organization = {France Culture},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Colonisation: l’amnésie européenne? Online
Arte’s Vox pop 2020.
@online{Nicolaidïs2020i,
title = {Colonisation: l’amnésie européenne?},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.arte.tv/fr/videos/091151-029-A/vox-pop/},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-00-00},
organization = {Arte’s Vox pop},
abstract = {Si les principaux acteurs de la colonisation furent le Royaume-Uni, la France, les Pays-Bas, l’Espagne, le Portugal, l’Italie et la Belgique, l’ensemble de l’Europe en a profité sur le plan économique et financier. Face aux nombreuses exactions commises et à une décolonisation souvent sanglante, qu’en est-il du travail de mémoire et de la reconnaissance des oppressions ? Ne serait-il pas temps de s’excuser et d’indemniser, comme le réclament de plus en plus de victimes, d’historiens et de politiques ? Vox pop a mené l’enquête en Belgique, où les métis nés dans les anciennes colonies demandent réparation à l’État : ils ont été à l’époque arrachés à leur mère et victimes de ségrégation. Puis, Nora Hamadi s’entretient avec Kalypso Nicolaïdis, professeure en relations internationales à l’université d’Oxford et responsable du groupe de travail sur le colonialisme, et Bruno Sena Martins, anthropologue et professeur à l’université de Coimbra, au Portugal. Enfin, place aux correspondants de l’émission : Abdelkader Benali explique qu’aux Pays-Bas de nombreux citoyens ont encore la nostalgie de "l’empire perdu". Johannes Kulms, lui, ouvre une fenêtre sur l’Allemagne, où l’on veut cesser d’honorer d’anciens colonisateurs.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Si les principaux acteurs de la colonisation furent le Royaume-Uni, la France, les Pays-Bas, l’Espagne, le Portugal, l’Italie et la Belgique, l’ensemble de l’Europe en a profité sur le plan économique et financier. Face aux nombreuses exactions commises et à une décolonisation souvent sanglante, qu’en est-il du travail de mémoire et de la reconnaissance des oppressions ? Ne serait-il pas temps de s’excuser et d’indemniser, comme le réclament de plus en plus de victimes, d’historiens et de politiques ? Vox pop a mené l’enquête en Belgique, où les métis nés dans les anciennes colonies demandent réparation à l’État : ils ont été à l’époque arrachés à leur mère et victimes de ségrégation. Puis, Nora Hamadi s’entretient avec Kalypso Nicolaïdis, professeure en relations internationales à l’université d’Oxford et responsable du groupe de travail sur le colonialisme, et Bruno Sena Martins, anthropologue et professeur à l’université de Coimbra, au Portugal. Enfin, place aux correspondants de l’émission : Abdelkader Benali explique qu’aux Pays-Bas de nombreux citoyens ont encore la nostalgie de "l’empire perdu". Johannes Kulms, lui, ouvre une fenêtre sur l’Allemagne, où l’on veut cesser d’honorer d’anciens colonisateurs.
2019
Meunier, Sophie; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy Journal Article
In: JCMS, 57 , pp. 103-113, 2019.
@article{Meunier2019,
title = {The Geopoliticization of European Trade and Investment Policy},
author = {Sophie Meunier and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/jcms.12932.pdf},
doi = {10.1111/jcms.12932},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-10-00},
journal = {JCMS},
volume = {57},
pages = {103-113},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
A European pivot from space to time Online
Social Europe 2019.
@online{Nicolaidïs2019,
title = {A European pivot from space to time},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.socialeurope.eu/a-european-pivot-from-space-to-time/},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-09-11},
organization = {Social Europe},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Verfassungsblog 2019.
@online{Nicolaidïs2019b,
title = {Schroedinger’s Backstop: Managed Mutual Recognition and the Compatibility Model: a Commentary on the Weiler, Sarmiento and Faull Proposal},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://verfassungsblog.de/schroedingers-backstop/},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-09-04},
organization = {Verfassungsblog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Verfassungsblog 2019.
@online{Nicolaidïs2019e,
title = {Schroedinger’s Backstop - Managed Mutual Recognition and the Compatibility Model: a Commentary on the Weiler, Sarmiento and Fall Proposal},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://verfassungsblog.de/schroedingers-backstop/},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-09-00},
organization = {Verfassungsblog},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Exodus, Reckoning, Sacrifice: Three Meanings of Brexit Book
Unbound Publishers, London, 2019, ISBN: 1783528095.
@book{Nicolaidïs2019g,
title = {Exodus, Reckoning, Sacrifice: Three Meanings of Brexit},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://unbound.com/books/exodus-reckoning-sacrifice/},
isbn = {1783528095},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-06-27},
booktitle = {Exodus, Reckoning, Sacrifice: Three Meanings of Brexit},
pages = {488},
publisher = {Unbound Publishers},
address = {London},
abstract = {In this saga through Brexit mythology, Kalypso Nicolaidis asks what 'means' means in “Brexit means Brexit.” She offers a plea for acknowledging each other’s stories, with their many variants, ambiguities and contradictions. And in this spirit of recognition, calls for a mutually respectful, do-no-harm Brexit - the smarter, kinder and gentler Brexit possible in our hard-edged epoch of resentment and frustration.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
In this saga through Brexit mythology, Kalypso Nicolaidis asks what 'means' means in “Brexit means Brexit.” She offers a plea for acknowledging each other’s stories, with their many variants, ambiguities and contradictions. And in this spirit of recognition, calls for a mutually respectful, do-no-harm Brexit - the smarter, kinder and gentler Brexit possible in our hard-edged epoch of resentment and frustration.
Lenz, Tobias; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
EU-topia? A critique of the European Union as a model Journal Article
In: Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 4 (2), pp. 78-101, 2019.
@article{Nicolaidïs2019d,
title = {EU-topia? A critique of the European Union as a model},
author = {Tobias Lenz and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Lenz_Nicolaidis-EUasamodel.pdf},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-00-00},
journal = {Culture, Practice & Europeanization},
volume = {4},
number = {2},
pages = {78-101},
abstract = {The paper critically appraises the idea, both descriptively and normatively, that the Euro- pean Union (EU) system can and should serve as a model for governance beyond its own borders. Engaging the postcolonial literature, it proposes a critical analysis of the idea, dis- course and practice of Europe-as-a-model. We argue for a problematization of the label “model” without denying the value added by EU governance for the rest of the world. We start by developing an analytical heuristic that builds on three semantic meanings of the term model and outline the challenges of interpretation and translation that are associ- ated with each. We then discuss these challenges along the Hegelian three-step of the model idea (thesis), its postcolonial antithesis and our constructive critique that seeks to steer a middle ground. We advocate greater reflexivity on the part of Europeans, that is, to systematically question assumptions behind their discourse and practice. If the cosmo- politan promise is to be retrieved from the radical critique of Eurocentricism, Europeans need to infuse the EU’s message and practice with an ethos of mutual recognition as a crucial feature of a post-colonial agenda for the EU’s role in the world.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The paper critically appraises the idea, both descriptively and normatively, that the Euro- pean Union (EU) system can and should serve as a model for governance beyond its own borders. Engaging the postcolonial literature, it proposes a critical analysis of the idea, dis- course and practice of Europe-as-a-model. We argue for a problematization of the label “model” without denying the value added by EU governance for the rest of the world. We start by developing an analytical heuristic that builds on three semantic meanings of the term model and outline the challenges of interpretation and translation that are associ- ated with each. We then discuss these challenges along the Hegelian three-step of the model idea (thesis), its postcolonial antithesis and our constructive critique that seeks to steer a middle ground. We advocate greater reflexivity on the part of Europeans, that is, to systematically question assumptions behind their discourse and practice. If the cosmo- politan promise is to be retrieved from the radical critique of Eurocentricism, Europeans need to infuse the EU’s message and practice with an ethos of mutual recognition as a crucial feature of a post-colonial agenda for the EU’s role in the world.
van Zeben, Josephine; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Polycentric Subsidiarity Book Chapter
In: van Zeben, Josephine; Bobić, Ana (Ed.): Polycentricity in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
@inbook{vanZeben2019,
title = {Polycentric Subsidiarity},
author = {Josephine van Zeben and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Josephine van Zeben and Ana Bobić},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Nicolaidis-and-Van-Zeben-Polycentric-Subsidiarity.pdf},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-00-00},
booktitle = {Polycentricity in the European Union},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
For a Demoicratization of Eurozone Governance Book Chapter
In: Hennette, Stephanie (Ed.): How to Democratize Europe, pp. 100-108, Harvard University Press, 2019.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2019f,
title = {For a Demoicratization of Eurozone Governance},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Stephanie Hennette},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/How-to-demoicratise-Eurozone-page-proofs-2019.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674239616-012},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-00-00},
booktitle = {How to Democratize Europe},
pages = {100-108},
publisher = {Harvard University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Sustainable Integration: The silver lining of a democratically challenged EU Online
Bertelsmann Stiftung 2019.
@online{Nicolaidïs2019h,
title = {Sustainable Integration: The silver lining of a democratically challenged EU},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Essay_Nicolaidis.pdf},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-00-00},
organization = {Bertelsmann Stiftung},
abstract = {The EU should act as the guardian of sustainable integration. Sustainable integration in this sense comprises but is broader than the sustainability agenda of the UN, and includes all policies, laws, and actions.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
The EU should act as the guardian of sustainable integration. Sustainable integration in this sense comprises but is broader than the sustainability agenda of the UN, and includes all policies, laws, and actions.
2018
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Braving the Waves? Europe’s Constitutional Settlement at 20 Journal Article
In: JCMS , 56 (7), pp. 1614–1630, 2018.
@article{Nicolaidïs2018b,
title = {Braving the Waves? Europe’s Constitutional Settlement at 20},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Braving-the-Waves-Nicolaidis-2018.pdf},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-21},
journal = {JCMS },
volume = {56},
number = {7},
pages = {1614–1630},
publisher = {JCMS},
abstract = {This article reflects on the diagnosis proposed in 1998 by Moravcsik and Nicolaidis that the EU had reached an incipient constitutional settlement and makes two connected arguments. First, analytically, that contrary to the prevailing view, the EU's constitutional settlement is holding, although it has come under assault from federalists and sovereignists alike. The bicycle theory nevertheless continues to hold sway perhaps because paradigm shifts always exhibit significant lags. Second, normatively, to defend ‘the equilibrium’ does not amount to a defense of the status quo. On the contrary, and especially in the context of the eurozone crisis, we must reflect on the social foundations of the European project, of which intermittent democratic discontent is only one expression. The argument unfolds through four European cities, each regarding a different moment in the Constitutional saga of the last two decades, to conclude on the relationship between LI and demoicratic theory, as well as the promise of sustainable integration.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article reflects on the diagnosis proposed in 1998 by Moravcsik and Nicolaidis that the EU had reached an incipient constitutional settlement and makes two connected arguments. First, analytically, that contrary to the prevailing view, the EU's constitutional settlement is holding, although it has come under assault from federalists and sovereignists alike. The bicycle theory nevertheless continues to hold sway perhaps because paradigm shifts always exhibit significant lags. Second, normatively, to defend ‘the equilibrium’ does not amount to a defense of the status quo. On the contrary, and especially in the context of the eurozone crisis, we must reflect on the social foundations of the European project, of which intermittent democratic discontent is only one expression. The argument unfolds through four European cities, each regarding a different moment in the Constitutional saga of the last two decades, to conclude on the relationship between LI and demoicratic theory, as well as the promise of sustainable integration.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Brexit and the compatibility paradigm Online
The UK in a Changing Europe Research Paper 2018.
@online{Nicolaidïs2018,
title = {Brexit and the compatibility paradigm},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Brexit-and-the-compatibility-paradigm.pdf},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-03-15},
journal = {Brexit and the compatibility paradigm,” The UK in a Changing Europe Research Paper, 15 March 2018},
organization = {The UK in a Changing Europe Research Paper},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The EU’s Constitutional Moment: A View from the Ground Up Book Chapter
In: Barber, Nick; Cahill, Maria; Ekins, Richard (Ed.): The Rise and Fall of the European Constitution, Hart Publishing, 2018.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2018c,
title = {The EU’s Constitutional Moment: A View from the Ground Up},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Nick Barber and Maria Cahill and Richard Ekins},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Nicolaidis-The-EUs-Constitutional-Moment-2018.pdf},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-00-00},
booktitle = {The Rise and Fall of the European Constitution},
publisher = {Hart Publishing},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
2017
Latifi, Veton; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Resolving the Macedonian Name Dispute: Prospect for Transformative Mutual Recognition Online
ECFR 2017.
@online{Latifi2017,
title = {Resolving the Macedonian Name Dispute: Prospect for Transformative Mutual Recognition},
author = {Veton Latifi and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_resolving_the_macedonian_name_dispute_prospect_for_transformativ/},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-12-12},
organization = {ECFR},
abstract = {This article argues that the current window of opportunity must be seized and provides a roadmap to resolving the Macedonian Name Dispute. It argues that the dispute needs to be addressed under the principles of freedom, responsibility and mutual recognition. In this spirit, the two sides need to distinguish between issues where they can agree to disagree and those where they need to agree; they need to agree to the goal for their negotiations; and they need to agree on a breakthrough and a roadmap. They also need to agree on a story, that Macedonia is a region shared between several states which must all abstain from “identity monopoly.” On this ground, a new permanent name can be agreed to and its adoption for international, not domestic purposes, can be linked to NATO membership and EU negotiations. Name options are mapped out through three levels of specificity, where the authors indicate what they believe to be the pros and cons of each option.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
This article argues that the current window of opportunity must be seized and provides a roadmap to resolving the Macedonian Name Dispute. It argues that the dispute needs to be addressed under the principles of freedom, responsibility and mutual recognition. In this spirit, the two sides need to distinguish between issues where they can agree to disagree and those where they need to agree; they need to agree to the goal for their negotiations; and they need to agree on a breakthrough and a roadmap. They also need to agree on a story, that Macedonia is a region shared between several states which must all abstain from “identity monopoly.” On this ground, a new permanent name can be agreed to and its adoption for international, not domestic purposes, can be linked to NATO membership and EU negotiations. Name options are mapped out through three levels of specificity, where the authors indicate what they believe to be the pros and cons of each option.
Enoch, Charles; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The art of triangulation: Will Greece’s debt crisis finally come to an end? Online
Programme on the Political Economy of Financial Market and SEESOX, University of Oxford 2017.
@online{Enoch2017b,
title = {The art of triangulation: Will Greece’s debt crisis finally come to an end?},
author = {Charles Enoch and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Nicolaidis_the_art_of_triangulation.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-11-00},
organization = {Programme on the Political Economy of Financial Market and SEESOX, University of Oxford},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Brexit as myth: Exodus, Reckoning, or Sacrifice? Online
Standpoint 2017.
@online{Nicolaidïs2017e,
title = {Brexit as myth: Exodus, Reckoning, or Sacrifice?},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://standpointmag.co.uk/features-july-august-2017-kalypso-nicolaidis-three-meanings-of-brexit-exodus-reckoning-sacrifice/},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-06-27},
issuetitle = {July/August},
journal = {Standpoint},
organization = {Standpoint},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Bellamy, Richard; Lacey, Joseph; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
European boundaries in question? Journal Article
In: Journal of European Integration, 39 (5), pp. 483-498, 2017, ISSN: 1477-2280.
@article{Bellamy2017,
title = {European boundaries in question?},
author = {Richard Bellamy and Joseph Lacey and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/European-boundaries-in-question.pdf},
doi = {10.1080/07036337.2017.1333118},
issn = {1477-2280},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-05-00},
journal = {Journal of European Integration},
volume = {39},
number = {5},
pages = {483-498},
abstract = {This introduction provides a descriptive typology and normative analysis of the ways boundaries are being questioned in Europe. We distinguish between boundary-making (defining or redefining the territorial borders of a polity), boundary-crossing (determining the rules of access to territorial borders) and boundary-unbundling (allowing boundary-making and boundary-crossing to vary between policies and polities), noting each of these categories possesses internal and external dimensions. Cosmopolitans and statists offer contrasting normative evaluations of these processes, favouring weakening and maintaining or strengthening state boundaries respectively. We endorse a demoicratic approach lying between these two as better reflecting how individuals relate to each other and to the EU, a view shared by some but not all contributors to this volume. We conclude by situating the contributions within our topological framework, highlighting how they illustrate the contemporary questioning of European boundaries.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This introduction provides a descriptive typology and normative analysis of the ways boundaries are being questioned in Europe. We distinguish between boundary-making (defining or redefining the territorial borders of a polity), boundary-crossing (determining the rules of access to territorial borders) and boundary-unbundling (allowing boundary-making and boundary-crossing to vary between policies and polities), noting each of these categories possesses internal and external dimensions. Cosmopolitans and statists offer contrasting normative evaluations of these processes, favouring weakening and maintaining or strengthening state boundaries respectively. We endorse a demoicratic approach lying between these two as better reflecting how individuals relate to each other and to the EU, a view shared by some but not all contributors to this volume. We conclude by situating the contributions within our topological framework, highlighting how they illustrate the contemporary questioning of European boundaries.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Brexit Arithmetics Book Chapter
In: Armour, John; Eidenmüller, Horst (Ed.): Negotiating Brexit , C.H. Beck/Hart Publishing, Munich/Oxford, 2017.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2017,
title = {Brexit Arithmetics},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {John Armour and Horst Eidenmüller},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Brexit-Arithmetics-Armour-OUP.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
volume = {Negotiating Brexit},
publisher = {C.H. Beck/Hart Publishing},
address = {Munich/Oxford},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Mutual Recognition: Promise and Denial, from Sapiens to Brexit Journal Article
In: Current Legal Problems, 70 (1), pp. 1-40, 2017.
@article{Nicolaidïs2017b,
title = {Mutual Recognition: Promise and Denial, from Sapiens to Brexit},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Mutual-Recognition-Promise-and-Denial-from-Sapiens-to-Brexit-Nicolaidis.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
journal = {Current Legal Problems},
volume = {70},
number = {1},
pages = {1-40},
abstract = {This contribution argues that the European crisis in general and Brexit in particular, can be seen to reflect the partial loss of the ethos of a principle that has been at the heart of the EU, namely mutual recognition. While familiar to legal scholars as a norm governing the integration of markets and the management of conflicts of law, the essay seeks to show how this principle bears on our current European predicament as a philoso- phical concept and a form of governance between states before dwelling on the intricacies of mutual recognition in the EU single market. Because recog- nition is sought, obtained or denied in all social spheres, every discipline has its own complex variation on this simple theme requiring to connect legal theory with anthropology, philosophy, history, sociology and international relations. The essay spans all these fields through eight takes (mutual Recognition shunned, invented, enshrined, constitutionalised, managed, ‘on trial’, lost, and for grabs) which can also be interpreted as different time horizons (from Sapiens to Brexit through Westphalia). Each take provides a variation on what is referred to as “mutual recognition paradox”, eg how to increase mutual engagement and mutual deference at the very same time.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This contribution argues that the European crisis in general and Brexit in particular, can be seen to reflect the partial loss of the ethos of a principle that has been at the heart of the EU, namely mutual recognition. While familiar to legal scholars as a norm governing the integration of markets and the management of conflicts of law, the essay seeks to show how this principle bears on our current European predicament as a philoso- phical concept and a form of governance between states before dwelling on the intricacies of mutual recognition in the EU single market. Because recog- nition is sought, obtained or denied in all social spheres, every discipline has its own complex variation on this simple theme requiring to connect legal theory with anthropology, philosophy, history, sociology and international relations. The essay spans all these fields through eight takes (mutual Recognition shunned, invented, enshrined, constitutionalised, managed, ‘on trial’, lost, and for grabs) which can also be interpreted as different time horizons (from Sapiens to Brexit through Westphalia). Each take provides a variation on what is referred to as “mutual recognition paradox”, eg how to increase mutual engagement and mutual deference at the very same time.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The Political Mantra: Brexit, Control and the Transformation of the European Order Book Chapter
In: Fabbrini, Federico (Ed.): The Law and Politics of Brexit , Oxford University Press, 2017.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2017c,
title = {The Political Mantra: Brexit, Control and the Transformation of the European Order},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Federico Fabbrini},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Fabbrini-revised-ch-2.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
volume = {The Law and Politics of Brexit},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Viehoff, Juri
Just boundaries for demoicrats Journal Article
In: Journal of European Integration, 39 (5), 2017.
@article{Nicolaidïs2017f,
title = {Just boundaries for demoicrats},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Juri Viehoff},
url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07036337.2017.1337111},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
journal = {Journal of European Integration},
volume = {39},
number = {5},
abstract = {This article asks what features should characterise the boundaries between the EU and the outside world from the standpoint of demoicracy. Section one summarises the normative core of that view and grounds it in the values of autonomy, equal recognition and non-domination. Section two categorises the issues that arise for the demoicrat when it comes to the consequences of political borders. We demonstrate – through the example of intra-demoicracy border crossing – why demoicrats will seek to follow the three desiderata of procedural fairness, just outcomes, and overall consistency in designing political solutions. Section three defends a set of principles that would ideally govern large-scale arrival of refugees. Section four addresses questions of non-ideal theory, reflecting on how demoïcratic theorists should think about current EU policies. Though we do not offer a comprehensive solution to the tensions we identify, the conclusion offers some proposals of how demoicrats may alleviate them.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article asks what features should characterise the boundaries between the EU and the outside world from the standpoint of demoicracy. Section one summarises the normative core of that view and grounds it in the values of autonomy, equal recognition and non-domination. Section two categorises the issues that arise for the demoicrat when it comes to the consequences of political borders. We demonstrate – through the example of intra-demoicracy border crossing – why demoicrats will seek to follow the three desiderata of procedural fairness, just outcomes, and overall consistency in designing political solutions. Section three defends a set of principles that would ideally govern large-scale arrival of refugees. Section four addresses questions of non-ideal theory, reflecting on how demoïcratic theorists should think about current EU policies. Though we do not offer a comprehensive solution to the tensions we identify, the conclusion offers some proposals of how demoicrats may alleviate them.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Sustainable Integration in a Demoicratic Polity: A New (or not so new) Ambition For the European Union after Brexit Book Chapter
In: Staiger, Uta (Ed.): Brexit and Beyond , Cambridge University Press, 2017.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2017g,
title = {Sustainable Integration in a Demoicratic Polity: A New (or not so new) Ambition For the European Union after Brexit},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Uta Staiger},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Sustainable-Integration-Nicolaidis-Final.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
journal = {Brexit and Beyond},
volume = {Brexit and Beyond},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Meunier, Sophie; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The European Union as a Trade Power Book Chapter
In: Hill, Christopher; Smith, Michael (Ed.): The International Relations of the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017.
@inbook{Meunier2017,
title = {The European Union as a Trade Power},
author = {Sophie Meunier and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Christopher Hill and Michael Smith},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/2017MeunierNicolaidisChapter.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
booktitle = {The International Relations of the European Union},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
address = {Oxford},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
2016
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Sustainable Integration: A New Ambition for the EU Online
Social Europe 2016.
@online{Nicolaidïs2016c,
title = {Sustainable Integration: A New Ambition for the EU},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.socialeurope.eu/sustainable-integration-new-ambition-eu},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-10-00},
organization = {Social Europe},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Walking the Grid of Freedom Online
Open Democracy 2016.
@online{Nicolaidïs2016,
title = {Walking the Grid of Freedom},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.opendemocracy.net/kalypso-nicola-dis/walking-grid-of-freedom},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-08-27},
organization = {Open Democracy},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The Cassis Legacy: Kir, Banks, Plumbers, Drugs, Criminals and Refugees Book Chapter
In: Davies, Bill; Nicola, Fernanda (Ed.): European Law Stories: Critical and Contextual Histories of European Jurisprudence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2016e,
title = {The Cassis Legacy: Kir, Banks, Plumbers, Drugs, Criminals and Refugees},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Bill Davies and Fernanda Nicola},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/nikolaidis-the-cassis-legacy-2016.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-04-00},
booktitle = { European Law Stories: Critical and Contextual Histories of European Jurisprudence},
publisher = {Cambridge: Cambridge University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Sussman, Sam; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
R2P: State of Play Journal Article
In: The International Spectator, 51 (2), pp. 9-18, 2016.
@article{Sussman2016,
title = {R2P: State of Play},
author = {Sam Sussman and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/R2P-State-of-Play-SussmanNicolaidis.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
journal = {The International Spectator},
volume = {51},
number = {2},
pages = {9-18},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Cheneval, Francis; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The Social Construction of Demoicracy in the EU Journal Article
In: European Journal of Political Theory, 16 (2), pp. 235-60, 2016.
@article{Nicolaidïs2016b,
title = {The Social Construction of Demoicracy in the EU},
author = {Francis Cheneval and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Social-Construction-demoicracy-Cheneval-and-Nicolaidis.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
journal = {European Journal of Political Theory},
volume = {16},
number = {2},
pages = {235-60},
abstract = {The Eurozone crisis has brought the imperative of democratic autonomy within the EU to the forefront, a concern at the core of demoicratic theory. The article seeks to move the scholarship on demoicratic theory a step further by exploring what we call the social construction of demoicratic reality. While the EU’s legal-institutional infrastructure may imperfectly approximate a demoicratic structure, we need ask to what extent the ‘bare bones’ demoicratic character of a polity can actually be grounded in a full-flesh social construct that is or could be acted out in the democratic experience and the self-awareness of its peoples. Ultimately, such an enquiry should help us understand whether a polity like the EU is actually and potentially a stable or unstable political form. We develop a consistent theory of popular sovereignty drawing on John Searle and HLA Hart to conceive the constitutionalised people (dêmos) as a social fact and the sovereignty of the people as a status ascribed to the people. We use this construction of demoicratic reality as a conceptual framework to understand the possibility of popular sovereignty being exercised concurrently by several rather than just one dêmos.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The Eurozone crisis has brought the imperative of democratic autonomy within the EU to the forefront, a concern at the core of demoicratic theory. The article seeks to move the scholarship on demoicratic theory a step further by exploring what we call the social construction of demoicratic reality. While the EU’s legal-institutional infrastructure may imperfectly approximate a demoicratic structure, we need ask to what extent the ‘bare bones’ demoicratic character of a polity can actually be grounded in a full-flesh social construct that is or could be acted out in the democratic experience and the self-awareness of its peoples. Ultimately, such an enquiry should help us understand whether a polity like the EU is actually and potentially a stable or unstable political form. We develop a consistent theory of popular sovereignty drawing on John Searle and HLA Hart to conceive the constitutionalised people (dêmos) as a social fact and the sovereignty of the people as a status ascribed to the people. We use this construction of demoicratic reality as a conceptual framework to understand the possibility of popular sovereignty being exercised concurrently by several rather than just one dêmos.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Namur Declaration Online
2016.
@online{Nicolaidïs2016d,
title = {Namur Declaration},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.bilaterals.org/?namur-declaration},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
abstract = {The propositions of the Namur Declaration seek to change the way in which the European Union negotiates international trade agreements and their content},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
The propositions of the Namur Declaration seek to change the way in which the European Union negotiates international trade agreements and their content
Howse, Robert; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Toward a Global Ethics of Trade Governance: Subsidiarity Writ Large Journal Article
In: Law and Contemporary Problem, 79:259 (2), 2016.
@article{Howse2016,
title = {Toward a Global Ethics of Trade Governance: Subsidiarity Writ Large},
author = {Robert Howse and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Toward-a-Global-Ethics-of-Trade-Governance-Subsidiarity-Writ-Lar.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
journal = {Law and Contemporary Problem},
volume = {79:259},
number = {2},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
EUtopia or Aporia? Europe’s Demoicracy in Crisis Book Chapter
In: Hubman, Philipp (Ed.): Political Aporia. Actors and Practices of Dilemma, 2016.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2016f,
title = {EUtopia or Aporia? Europe’s Demoicracy in Crisis},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Philipp Hubman},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Nicolaidis_Aporia-FINAL.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
booktitle = {Political Aporia. Actors and Practices of Dilemma},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}