2019
van Zeben, Josephine; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Polycentric Subsidiarity Book Chapter
In: van Zeben, Josephine; Bobić, Ana (Ed.): Polycentricity in the European Union, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
@inbook{vanZeben2019,
title = {Polycentric Subsidiarity},
author = {Josephine van Zeben and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Josephine van Zeben and Ana Bobić},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Nicolaidis-and-Van-Zeben-Polycentric-Subsidiarity.pdf},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-00-00},
booktitle = {Polycentricity in the European Union},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
For a Demoicratization of Eurozone Governance Book Chapter
In: Hennette, Stephanie (Ed.): How to Democratize Europe, pp. 100-108, Harvard University Press, 2019.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2019f,
title = {For a Demoicratization of Eurozone Governance},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Stephanie Hennette},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/How-to-demoicratise-Eurozone-page-proofs-2019.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674239616-012},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-00-00},
booktitle = {How to Democratize Europe},
pages = {100-108},
publisher = {Harvard University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Sustainable Integration: The silver lining of a democratically challenged EU Online
Bertelsmann Stiftung 2019.
@online{Nicolaidïs2019h,
title = {Sustainable Integration: The silver lining of a democratically challenged EU},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/Essay_Nicolaidis.pdf},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-00-00},
organization = {Bertelsmann Stiftung},
abstract = {The EU should act as the guardian of sustainable integration. Sustainable integration in this sense comprises but is broader than the sustainability agenda of the UN, and includes all policies, laws, and actions.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
The EU should act as the guardian of sustainable integration. Sustainable integration in this sense comprises but is broader than the sustainability agenda of the UN, and includes all policies, laws, and actions.
2018
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Braving the Waves? Europe’s Constitutional Settlement at 20 Journal Article
In: JCMS , vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1614–1630, 2018.
@article{Nicolaidïs2018b,
title = {Braving the Waves? Europe’s Constitutional Settlement at 20},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Braving-the-Waves-Nicolaidis-2018.pdf},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-21},
journal = {JCMS },
volume = {56},
number = {7},
pages = {1614–1630},
publisher = {JCMS},
abstract = {This article reflects on the diagnosis proposed in 1998 by Moravcsik and Nicolaidis that the EU had reached an incipient constitutional settlement and makes two connected arguments. First, analytically, that contrary to the prevailing view, the EU's constitutional settlement is holding, although it has come under assault from federalists and sovereignists alike. The bicycle theory nevertheless continues to hold sway perhaps because paradigm shifts always exhibit significant lags. Second, normatively, to defend ‘the equilibrium’ does not amount to a defense of the status quo. On the contrary, and especially in the context of the eurozone crisis, we must reflect on the social foundations of the European project, of which intermittent democratic discontent is only one expression. The argument unfolds through four European cities, each regarding a different moment in the Constitutional saga of the last two decades, to conclude on the relationship between LI and demoicratic theory, as well as the promise of sustainable integration.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article reflects on the diagnosis proposed in 1998 by Moravcsik and Nicolaidis that the EU had reached an incipient constitutional settlement and makes two connected arguments. First, analytically, that contrary to the prevailing view, the EU's constitutional settlement is holding, although it has come under assault from federalists and sovereignists alike. The bicycle theory nevertheless continues to hold sway perhaps because paradigm shifts always exhibit significant lags. Second, normatively, to defend ‘the equilibrium’ does not amount to a defense of the status quo. On the contrary, and especially in the context of the eurozone crisis, we must reflect on the social foundations of the European project, of which intermittent democratic discontent is only one expression. The argument unfolds through four European cities, each regarding a different moment in the Constitutional saga of the last two decades, to conclude on the relationship between LI and demoicratic theory, as well as the promise of sustainable integration.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Brexit and the compatibility paradigm Online
The UK in a Changing Europe Research Paper 2018.
@online{Nicolaidïs2018,
title = {Brexit and the compatibility paradigm},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Brexit-and-the-compatibility-paradigm.pdf},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-03-15},
journal = {Brexit and the compatibility paradigm,” The UK in a Changing Europe Research Paper, 15 March 2018},
organization = {The UK in a Changing Europe Research Paper},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The EU’s Constitutional Moment: A View from the Ground Up Book Chapter
In: Barber, Nick; Cahill, Maria; Ekins, Richard (Ed.): The Rise and Fall of the European Constitution, Hart Publishing, 2018.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2018c,
title = {The EU’s Constitutional Moment: A View from the Ground Up},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Nick Barber and Maria Cahill and Richard Ekins},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Nicolaidis-The-EUs-Constitutional-Moment-2018.pdf},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-00-00},
booktitle = {The Rise and Fall of the European Constitution},
publisher = {Hart Publishing},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
2017
Latifi, Veton; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Resolving the Macedonian Name Dispute: Prospect for Transformative Mutual Recognition Online
ECFR 2017.
@online{Latifi2017,
title = {Resolving the Macedonian Name Dispute: Prospect for Transformative Mutual Recognition},
author = {Veton Latifi and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_resolving_the_macedonian_name_dispute_prospect_for_transformativ/},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-12-12},
organization = {ECFR},
abstract = {This article argues that the current window of opportunity must be seized and provides a roadmap to resolving the Macedonian Name Dispute. It argues that the dispute needs to be addressed under the principles of freedom, responsibility and mutual recognition. In this spirit, the two sides need to distinguish between issues where they can agree to disagree and those where they need to agree; they need to agree to the goal for their negotiations; and they need to agree on a breakthrough and a roadmap. They also need to agree on a story, that Macedonia is a region shared between several states which must all abstain from “identity monopoly.” On this ground, a new permanent name can be agreed to and its adoption for international, not domestic purposes, can be linked to NATO membership and EU negotiations. Name options are mapped out through three levels of specificity, where the authors indicate what they believe to be the pros and cons of each option.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
This article argues that the current window of opportunity must be seized and provides a roadmap to resolving the Macedonian Name Dispute. It argues that the dispute needs to be addressed under the principles of freedom, responsibility and mutual recognition. In this spirit, the two sides need to distinguish between issues where they can agree to disagree and those where they need to agree; they need to agree to the goal for their negotiations; and they need to agree on a breakthrough and a roadmap. They also need to agree on a story, that Macedonia is a region shared between several states which must all abstain from “identity monopoly.” On this ground, a new permanent name can be agreed to and its adoption for international, not domestic purposes, can be linked to NATO membership and EU negotiations. Name options are mapped out through three levels of specificity, where the authors indicate what they believe to be the pros and cons of each option.
Enoch, Charles; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The art of triangulation: Will Greece’s debt crisis finally come to an end? Online
Programme on the Political Economy of Financial Market and SEESOX, University of Oxford 2017.
@online{Enoch2017b,
title = {The art of triangulation: Will Greece’s debt crisis finally come to an end?},
author = {Charles Enoch and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Nicolaidis_the_art_of_triangulation.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-11-00},
organization = {Programme on the Political Economy of Financial Market and SEESOX, University of Oxford},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Brexit as myth: Exodus, Reckoning, or Sacrifice? Online
Standpoint 2017.
@online{Nicolaidïs2017e,
title = {Brexit as myth: Exodus, Reckoning, or Sacrifice?},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://standpointmag.co.uk/features-july-august-2017-kalypso-nicolaidis-three-meanings-of-brexit-exodus-reckoning-sacrifice/},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-06-27},
issuetitle = {July/August},
journal = {Standpoint},
organization = {Standpoint},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Bellamy, Richard; Lacey, Joseph; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
European boundaries in question? Journal Article
In: Journal of European Integration, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 483-498, 2017, ISSN: 1477-2280.
@article{Bellamy2017,
title = {European boundaries in question?},
author = {Richard Bellamy and Joseph Lacey and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/European-boundaries-in-question.pdf},
doi = {10.1080/07036337.2017.1333118},
issn = {1477-2280},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-05-00},
journal = {Journal of European Integration},
volume = {39},
number = {5},
pages = {483-498},
abstract = {This introduction provides a descriptive typology and normative analysis of the ways boundaries are being questioned in Europe. We distinguish between boundary-making (defining or redefining the territorial borders of a polity), boundary-crossing (determining the rules of access to territorial borders) and boundary-unbundling (allowing boundary-making and boundary-crossing to vary between policies and polities), noting each of these categories possesses internal and external dimensions. Cosmopolitans and statists offer contrasting normative evaluations of these processes, favouring weakening and maintaining or strengthening state boundaries respectively. We endorse a demoicratic approach lying between these two as better reflecting how individuals relate to each other and to the EU, a view shared by some but not all contributors to this volume. We conclude by situating the contributions within our topological framework, highlighting how they illustrate the contemporary questioning of European boundaries.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This introduction provides a descriptive typology and normative analysis of the ways boundaries are being questioned in Europe. We distinguish between boundary-making (defining or redefining the territorial borders of a polity), boundary-crossing (determining the rules of access to territorial borders) and boundary-unbundling (allowing boundary-making and boundary-crossing to vary between policies and polities), noting each of these categories possesses internal and external dimensions. Cosmopolitans and statists offer contrasting normative evaluations of these processes, favouring weakening and maintaining or strengthening state boundaries respectively. We endorse a demoicratic approach lying between these two as better reflecting how individuals relate to each other and to the EU, a view shared by some but not all contributors to this volume. We conclude by situating the contributions within our topological framework, highlighting how they illustrate the contemporary questioning of European boundaries.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Brexit Arithmetics Book Chapter
In: Armour, John; Eidenmüller, Horst (Ed.): vol. Negotiating Brexit, C.H. Beck/Hart Publishing, Munich/Oxford, 2017.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2017,
title = {Brexit Arithmetics},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {John Armour and Horst Eidenmüller},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Brexit-Arithmetics-Armour-OUP.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
volume = {Negotiating Brexit},
publisher = {C.H. Beck/Hart Publishing},
address = {Munich/Oxford},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Mutual Recognition: Promise and Denial, from Sapiens to Brexit Journal Article
In: Current Legal Problems, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1-40, 2017.
@article{Nicolaidïs2017b,
title = {Mutual Recognition: Promise and Denial, from Sapiens to Brexit},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Mutual-Recognition-Promise-and-Denial-from-Sapiens-to-Brexit-Nicolaidis.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
journal = {Current Legal Problems},
volume = {70},
number = {1},
pages = {1-40},
abstract = {This contribution argues that the European crisis in general and Brexit in particular, can be seen to reflect the partial loss of the ethos of a principle that has been at the heart of the EU, namely mutual recognition. While familiar to legal scholars as a norm governing the integration of markets and the management of conflicts of law, the essay seeks to show how this principle bears on our current European predicament as a philoso- phical concept and a form of governance between states before dwelling on the intricacies of mutual recognition in the EU single market. Because recog- nition is sought, obtained or denied in all social spheres, every discipline has its own complex variation on this simple theme requiring to connect legal theory with anthropology, philosophy, history, sociology and international relations. The essay spans all these fields through eight takes (mutual Recognition shunned, invented, enshrined, constitutionalised, managed, ‘on trial’, lost, and for grabs) which can also be interpreted as different time horizons (from Sapiens to Brexit through Westphalia). Each take provides a variation on what is referred to as “mutual recognition paradox”, eg how to increase mutual engagement and mutual deference at the very same time.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This contribution argues that the European crisis in general and Brexit in particular, can be seen to reflect the partial loss of the ethos of a principle that has been at the heart of the EU, namely mutual recognition. While familiar to legal scholars as a norm governing the integration of markets and the management of conflicts of law, the essay seeks to show how this principle bears on our current European predicament as a philoso- phical concept and a form of governance between states before dwelling on the intricacies of mutual recognition in the EU single market. Because recog- nition is sought, obtained or denied in all social spheres, every discipline has its own complex variation on this simple theme requiring to connect legal theory with anthropology, philosophy, history, sociology and international relations. The essay spans all these fields through eight takes (mutual Recognition shunned, invented, enshrined, constitutionalised, managed, ‘on trial’, lost, and for grabs) which can also be interpreted as different time horizons (from Sapiens to Brexit through Westphalia). Each take provides a variation on what is referred to as “mutual recognition paradox”, eg how to increase mutual engagement and mutual deference at the very same time.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The Political Mantra: Brexit, Control and the Transformation of the European Order Book Chapter
In: Fabbrini, Federico (Ed.): vol. The Law and Politics of Brexit, Oxford University Press, 2017.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2017c,
title = {The Political Mantra: Brexit, Control and the Transformation of the European Order},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Federico Fabbrini},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Fabbrini-revised-ch-2.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
volume = {The Law and Politics of Brexit},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Viehoff, Juri
Just boundaries for demoicrats Journal Article
In: Journal of European Integration, vol. 39, no. 5, 2017.
@article{Nicolaidïs2017f,
title = {Just boundaries for demoicrats},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Juri Viehoff},
url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07036337.2017.1337111},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
journal = {Journal of European Integration},
volume = {39},
number = {5},
abstract = {This article asks what features should characterise the boundaries between the EU and the outside world from the standpoint of demoicracy. Section one summarises the normative core of that view and grounds it in the values of autonomy, equal recognition and non-domination. Section two categorises the issues that arise for the demoicrat when it comes to the consequences of political borders. We demonstrate – through the example of intra-demoicracy border crossing – why demoicrats will seek to follow the three desiderata of procedural fairness, just outcomes, and overall consistency in designing political solutions. Section three defends a set of principles that would ideally govern large-scale arrival of refugees. Section four addresses questions of non-ideal theory, reflecting on how demoïcratic theorists should think about current EU policies. Though we do not offer a comprehensive solution to the tensions we identify, the conclusion offers some proposals of how demoicrats may alleviate them.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article asks what features should characterise the boundaries between the EU and the outside world from the standpoint of demoicracy. Section one summarises the normative core of that view and grounds it in the values of autonomy, equal recognition and non-domination. Section two categorises the issues that arise for the demoicrat when it comes to the consequences of political borders. We demonstrate – through the example of intra-demoicracy border crossing – why demoicrats will seek to follow the three desiderata of procedural fairness, just outcomes, and overall consistency in designing political solutions. Section three defends a set of principles that would ideally govern large-scale arrival of refugees. Section four addresses questions of non-ideal theory, reflecting on how demoïcratic theorists should think about current EU policies. Though we do not offer a comprehensive solution to the tensions we identify, the conclusion offers some proposals of how demoicrats may alleviate them.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Sustainable Integration in a Demoicratic Polity: A New (or not so new) Ambition For the European Union after Brexit Book Chapter
In: Staiger, Uta (Ed.): vol. Brexit and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2017g,
title = {Sustainable Integration in a Demoicratic Polity: A New (or not so new) Ambition For the European Union after Brexit},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Uta Staiger},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Sustainable-Integration-Nicolaidis-Final.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
journal = {Brexit and Beyond},
volume = {Brexit and Beyond},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Meunier, Sophie; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The European Union as a Trade Power Book Chapter
In: Hill, Christopher; Smith, Michael (Ed.): The International Relations of the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017.
@inbook{Meunier2017,
title = {The European Union as a Trade Power},
author = {Sophie Meunier and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Christopher Hill and Michael Smith},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/2017MeunierNicolaidisChapter.pdf},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-00-00},
booktitle = {The International Relations of the European Union},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
address = {Oxford},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
2016
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Sustainable Integration: A New Ambition for the EU Online
Social Europe 2016.
@online{Nicolaidïs2016c,
title = {Sustainable Integration: A New Ambition for the EU},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.socialeurope.eu/sustainable-integration-new-ambition-eu},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-10-00},
organization = {Social Europe},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Walking the Grid of Freedom Online
Open Democracy 2016.
@online{Nicolaidïs2016,
title = {Walking the Grid of Freedom},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.opendemocracy.net/kalypso-nicola-dis/walking-grid-of-freedom},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-08-27},
organization = {Open Democracy},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The Cassis Legacy: Kir, Banks, Plumbers, Drugs, Criminals and Refugees Book Chapter
In: Davies, Bill; Nicola, Fernanda (Ed.): European Law Stories: Critical and Contextual Histories of European Jurisprudence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2016e,
title = {The Cassis Legacy: Kir, Banks, Plumbers, Drugs, Criminals and Refugees},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Bill Davies and Fernanda Nicola},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/nikolaidis-the-cassis-legacy-2016.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-04-00},
booktitle = { European Law Stories: Critical and Contextual Histories of European Jurisprudence},
publisher = {Cambridge: Cambridge University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Sussman, Sam; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
R2P: State of Play Journal Article
In: The International Spectator, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 9-18, 2016.
@article{Sussman2016,
title = {R2P: State of Play},
author = {Sam Sussman and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/R2P-State-of-Play-SussmanNicolaidis.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
journal = {The International Spectator},
volume = {51},
number = {2},
pages = {9-18},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Cheneval, Francis; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The Social Construction of Demoicracy in the EU Journal Article
In: European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 235-60, 2016.
@article{Nicolaidïs2016b,
title = {The Social Construction of Demoicracy in the EU},
author = {Francis Cheneval and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Social-Construction-demoicracy-Cheneval-and-Nicolaidis.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
journal = {European Journal of Political Theory},
volume = {16},
number = {2},
pages = {235-60},
abstract = {The Eurozone crisis has brought the imperative of democratic autonomy within the EU to the forefront, a concern at the core of demoicratic theory. The article seeks to move the scholarship on demoicratic theory a step further by exploring what we call the social construction of demoicratic reality. While the EU’s legal-institutional infrastructure may imperfectly approximate a demoicratic structure, we need ask to what extent the ‘bare bones’ demoicratic character of a polity can actually be grounded in a full-flesh social construct that is or could be acted out in the democratic experience and the self-awareness of its peoples. Ultimately, such an enquiry should help us understand whether a polity like the EU is actually and potentially a stable or unstable political form. We develop a consistent theory of popular sovereignty drawing on John Searle and HLA Hart to conceive the constitutionalised people (dêmos) as a social fact and the sovereignty of the people as a status ascribed to the people. We use this construction of demoicratic reality as a conceptual framework to understand the possibility of popular sovereignty being exercised concurrently by several rather than just one dêmos.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The Eurozone crisis has brought the imperative of democratic autonomy within the EU to the forefront, a concern at the core of demoicratic theory. The article seeks to move the scholarship on demoicratic theory a step further by exploring what we call the social construction of demoicratic reality. While the EU’s legal-institutional infrastructure may imperfectly approximate a demoicratic structure, we need ask to what extent the ‘bare bones’ demoicratic character of a polity can actually be grounded in a full-flesh social construct that is or could be acted out in the democratic experience and the self-awareness of its peoples. Ultimately, such an enquiry should help us understand whether a polity like the EU is actually and potentially a stable or unstable political form. We develop a consistent theory of popular sovereignty drawing on John Searle and HLA Hart to conceive the constitutionalised people (dêmos) as a social fact and the sovereignty of the people as a status ascribed to the people. We use this construction of demoicratic reality as a conceptual framework to understand the possibility of popular sovereignty being exercised concurrently by several rather than just one dêmos.
Magnette, Paul; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; et al,
Namur Declaration Online
2016, visited: 30.11.2015.
@online{Nicolaidïs2016d,
title = {Namur Declaration},
author = {Paul Magnette and Kalypso Nicolaidïs and et al},
url = {https://www.bilaterals.org/?namur-declaration},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
urldate = {2016-00-00},
abstract = {The propositions of the Namur Declaration seek to change the way in which the European Union negotiates international trade agreements and their content},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
The propositions of the Namur Declaration seek to change the way in which the European Union negotiates international trade agreements and their content
Howse, Robert; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Toward a Global Ethics of Trade Governance: Subsidiarity Writ Large Journal Article
In: Law and Contemporary Problem, vol. 79:259, no. 2, 2016.
@article{Howse2016,
title = {Toward a Global Ethics of Trade Governance: Subsidiarity Writ Large},
author = {Robert Howse and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Toward-a-Global-Ethics-of-Trade-Governance-Subsidiarity-Writ-Lar.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
journal = {Law and Contemporary Problem},
volume = {79:259},
number = {2},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
EUtopia or Aporia? Europe’s Demoicracy in Crisis Book Chapter
In: Hubman, Philipp (Ed.): Political Aporia. Actors and Practices of Dilemma, 2016.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2016f,
title = {EUtopia or Aporia? Europe’s Demoicracy in Crisis},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Philipp Hubman},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Nicolaidis_Aporia-FINAL.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
booktitle = {Political Aporia. Actors and Practices of Dilemma},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
My Eutopia: Empathy in a Union of Others Book Chapter
In: Segers, Mathieu; Albrecht, Yoeri (Ed.): Re:Thinking Europe, Thoughts on Europe: Past, Present and Future, Amsterdam University Press, 2016.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2016g,
title = {My Eutopia: Empathy in a Union of Others},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Mathieu Segers and Yoeri Albrecht},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Nicolaidis-ReThinking-Europe-EMPATHY.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
booktitle = {Re:Thinking Europe, Thoughts on Europe: Past, Present and Future},
publisher = {Amsterdam University Press},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The EU Global Strategy Online
European Union Institute for Strategic Studies 2016.
@online{Nicolaidïs2016h,
title = {The EU Global Strategy},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/EUGS-Opinion-Nicolaidis-2016.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-00},
booktitle = {The EU Global Strategy: 40 Expert Opinions},
organization = {European Union Institute for Strategic Studies},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
2015
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Begg, Iain; Bongardt, Annette; Torres, Francisco
EMU and Sustainable Integration Journal Article
In: Journal of European Integration, vol. 37, no. 7, 2015.
@article{Nicolaidïs2015d,
title = {EMU and Sustainable Integration},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Iain Begg and Annette Bongardt and Francisco Torres},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Sustainable-Integration-Nicolaidis-Final.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-11-00},
journal = {Journal of European Integration},
volume = {37},
number = {7},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Onar, Nora Fisher; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Europe’s Post-Imperial Condition Book Chapter
In: Behr, Hartmut; Stivachtis, Ioannis (Ed.): Revisiting the European Union as an Empire, Routledge, 2015, ISBN: 9781315745411.
@inbook{Onar2015,
title = {Europe’s Post-Imperial Condition},
author = {Nora Fisher Onar and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Hartmut Behr and Ioannis Stivachtis},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/NFO-and-KN-Post-Imperial-Europe.pdf},
isbn = {9781315745411},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-00},
booktitle = {Revisiting the European Union as an Empire},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {The European Union's stalled expansion, the Euro deficit and emerging crises of economic and political sovereignty in Greece, Italy and Spain have significantly altered the image of the EU as a model of progressive civilization. However, despite recent events the EU maintains its international image as the paragon of European politics and global governance.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
The European Union's stalled expansion, the Euro deficit and emerging crises of economic and political sovereignty in Greece, Italy and Spain have significantly altered the image of the EU as a model of progressive civilization. However, despite recent events the EU maintains its international image as the paragon of European politics and global governance.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Charlie Hebdo numero 1178: all is forgiven? Online
2015.
@online{Nicolaidïs2015g,
title = {Charlie Hebdo numero 1178: all is forgiven?},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/charlie-hebdo-numero-1178-all-is-forgiven/},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-28},
journal = {Open Democracy},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Balibar ou L’ Europe Evanescente Online
2015.
@online{Nicolaidïs2015f,
title = {Balibar ou L’ Europe Evanescente},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Balibar-ou-L’-Europe-Evanescente_2015.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-20},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Watson, Max
Sharing the Eurocrats’ Dream: A Demoi-cratic Approach to EMU Governance in the Post-Crisis Era Book Chapter
In: Chalmers, Damian; Jachtenfuchs, Markus; Joerges, Christian (Ed.): vol. The End of the Eurocrats Dream, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2015,
title = {Sharing the Eurocrats’ Dream: A Demoi-cratic Approach to EMU Governance in the Post-Crisis Era},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Max Watson},
editor = {Damian Chalmers and Markus Jachtenfuchs and Christian Joerges},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Nicolaidis-Watson-The-End-of-the-Eurocrats-Dream.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-00-00},
volume = {The End of the Eurocrats Dream},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Epilogue: the challenge of European demoi-cratization Journal Article
In: Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 145-153, 2015.
@article{Nicolaidïs2014c,
title = {Epilogue: the challenge of European demoi-cratization},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/JEPP-Epilogue-The-Challenge-of-Demoi-cratization.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-00-00},
journal = {Journal of European Public Policy},
volume = {22},
number = {1},
pages = {145-153},
abstract = {The conclusion to the collection draws out some of the insights from the contributions on the various challenges facing European demoi-cratization.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The conclusion to the collection draws out some of the insights from the contributions on the various challenges facing European demoi-cratization.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Perils of Unity, Promise of Union Book Chapter
In: Maduro, Miguel; Wind, Marlene (Ed.): vol. The Transformation of Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2015b,
title = {Perils of Unity, Promise of Union},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Miguel Maduro and Marlene Wind},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/perils_of_unity_promise_of_union.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-00-00},
volume = {The Transformation of Europe},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Demoicratic Theory and Europe’s Institutional Architecture in Times of Crisis Book Chapter
In: Piattoni, Simona (Ed.): vol. The European Union..., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2015c,
title = {Demoicratic Theory and Europe’s Institutional Architecture in Times of Crisis},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Simona Piattoni},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Demoicracy-Architecture-Piattoni-OUP-2015-5.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-00-00},
volume = {The European Union...},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
address = {Oxford},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Viehoff, Juri
Social Justice in the European Union: The Puzzles of Solidarity, Reciprocity and Choice Book
Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2015.
@book{Nicolaidïs2015e,
title = {Social Justice in the European Union: The Puzzles of Solidarity, Reciprocity and Choice},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Juri Viehoff},
editor = {Dimitry Kochenov and Grainne de Burca and Andrew Williams},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Justice-by-Viehoff-and-Nicolaidis-1.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-00-00},
volume = {Europe’s Justice Deficit },
publisher = {Hart Publishing},
address = {Oxford},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Gartzou-Katsouyanni, Kira; Shrag, Claudia; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
La crise de la zone Euro et le déni de l’autre Pour une reconstruction de la reconnaissance mutuelle Journal Article
In: 2015.
@article{Gartzou-Katsouyanni2015,
title = {La crise de la zone Euro et le déni de l’autre Pour une reconstruction de la reconnaissance mutuelle},
author = {Kira Gartzou-Katsouyanni and Claudia Shrag and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Eric Monnet and Claudia Shrag},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Nicolaidis-Garzou-Shrag-Reconnaissance.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-00-00},
booktitle = {Europe, Crise de Conscience},
publisher = {PUF- La Vie des Idées},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Gartzou-Katsouyanni, Kira; Sternberg, Claudia Schrag; Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
The Euro Crisis and the denial of the other. Rebuilding mutual recognition Book Chapter
In: Monnet, Eric; Sternberg, Claudia Schrag (Ed.): Euro, les années critiques, Presses Universitaires de France, 2015.
@inbook{Gartzou-Katsouyanni2015b,
title = {The Euro Crisis and the denial of the other. Rebuilding mutual recognition },
author = {Kira Gartzou-Katsouyanni and Claudia Schrag Sternberg and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Eric Monnet and Claudia Schrag Sternberg},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Gartzou_Nicolaidis_Sternberg_2015_The_Eu.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-00-00},
booktitle = {Euro, les années critiques},
publisher = {Presses Universitaires de France},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
2014
Sebe, Berny; Maas, Gabi; Nicolaïdis, Kalypso
Echoes of Empire: Memory, Identity and Colonial Legacies Book
1 edition, I.B. Tauris, 2014, ISBN: 9781784530501.
@book{Sebe2014,
title = {Echoes of Empire: Memory, Identity and Colonial Legacies},
author = {Berny Sebe and Gabi Maas and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},
editor = {Berny Sebe and Gabi Maas and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},
url = {https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/echoes-of-empire-9781784530501/},
isbn = {9781784530501},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-12-23},
urldate = {2014-12-23},
publisher = {I.B. Tauris},
edition = {1 edition},
abstract = {How does our colonial past echo through today's global politics? How have former empire-builders sought vindication or atonement, and formerly colonized states reversal or retribution? This groundbreaking book presents a panoramic view of attitudes to empires past and present, seen not only through the hard politics of international power structures but also through the nuances of memory, historiography and national and minority cultural identities. Bringing together leading historians, poitical scientists and international relations scholars from across the globe, Echoes of Empire emphasizes Europe's colonial legacy whilst also highlighting the importance of non-European power centres- Ottoman, Russian, Chinese, Japanese- in shaping world politics, then and now. Echoes of Empire bridges the divide between disciplines to trace the global routes travelled by objects, ideas and people and forms a radically different notion of the term 'empire' itself. This will be an essential companion to courses on international relations and imperial history as well as a fascinating read for anyone interested in Wesern hegemony, North-South relations, global power shifts and the longue duree.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
How does our colonial past echo through today's global politics? How have former empire-builders sought vindication or atonement, and formerly colonized states reversal or retribution? This groundbreaking book presents a panoramic view of attitudes to empires past and present, seen not only through the hard politics of international power structures but also through the nuances of memory, historiography and national and minority cultural identities. Bringing together leading historians, poitical scientists and international relations scholars from across the globe, Echoes of Empire emphasizes Europe's colonial legacy whilst also highlighting the importance of non-European power centres- Ottoman, Russian, Chinese, Japanese- in shaping world politics, then and now. Echoes of Empire bridges the divide between disciplines to trace the global routes travelled by objects, ideas and people and forms a radically different notion of the term 'empire' itself. This will be an essential companion to courses on international relations and imperial history as well as a fascinating read for anyone interested in Wesern hegemony, North-South relations, global power shifts and the longue duree.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Southern Barbarians? A post-colonial critic of EUniversalism Book Chapter
In: Sebe, Berny; Maas, Gabi; Nicolaïdis, Kalypso (Ed.): Echoes of Empire: Memory, Identity and Colonial Legacies, I.B. Tauris, 2014, ISBN: 9781784530501.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2014g,
title = {Southern Barbarians? A post-colonial critic of EUniversalism},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Berny Sebe and Gabi Maas and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Southern-Barbarians-Nicolaidis.pdf},
isbn = {9781784530501},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-12-23},
booktitle = {Echoes of Empire: Memory, Identity and Colonial Legacies},
publisher = {I.B. Tauris},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Nicolaïdis, Kalypso; Vergerio, Claire; Onar, Nora Fisher; Viehoff, Juri
From Metropolis to Microcosmos: The EU’s New Standards of Civilisation Journal Article
In: Millennium, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 718–745, 2014.
@article{Nicolaïdis2014f,
title = {From Metropolis to Microcosmos: The EU’s New Standards of Civilisation},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaïdis and Claire Vergerio and Nora Fisher Onar and Juri Viehoff},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/From-Metropolis-to-Microcosmos.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814541320},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-08-05},
journal = {Millennium},
volume = {42},
number = {3},
pages = {718–745},
abstract = {While some denounce the legacies of colonialism they discern in the EU’s practices and discourse, others believe these accusations to be unfounded, raising the question: how apt is the analogy between the 19th-century standard of civilisation and the EU’s narratives and modes of actions today? In this essay, we address the question by developing a ‘new standards typology’ articulated around two axes: agency denial and hierarchy. These refer respectively to the unilateral shaping of standards applicable to others, and to the salience of Eurocentricism in the way the standards are enforced and structure the international system. Ultimately, we argue that in transforming their ‘continent’ from a metropolis to a microcosmos – from a cluster of colonial capitals to an EU that contains many of the world’s tensions within itself – Europeans have only partially succeeded in transcending their colonial impulses. We conclude by suggesting that the EU’s relevance is grounded in its ability to become a post-colonial power, and that to achieve this, those acting in its name need to remember historical legacies and reflect upon the ‘standards’ that inspire their action.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
While some denounce the legacies of colonialism they discern in the EU’s practices and discourse, others believe these accusations to be unfounded, raising the question: how apt is the analogy between the 19th-century standard of civilisation and the EU’s narratives and modes of actions today? In this essay, we address the question by developing a ‘new standards typology’ articulated around two axes: agency denial and hierarchy. These refer respectively to the unilateral shaping of standards applicable to others, and to the salience of Eurocentricism in the way the standards are enforced and structure the international system. Ultimately, we argue that in transforming their ‘continent’ from a metropolis to a microcosmos – from a cluster of colonial capitals to an EU that contains many of the world’s tensions within itself – Europeans have only partially succeeded in transcending their colonial impulses. We conclude by suggesting that the EU’s relevance is grounded in its ability to become a post-colonial power, and that to achieve this, those acting in its name need to remember historical legacies and reflect upon the ‘standards’ that inspire their action.
Macaj, Gjovalin; Nicolaïdis, Kalypso
Beyond ‘one voice’? Global Europe's engagement with its own diversity Journal Article
In: Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1067-1083, 2014.
@article{Macaj2014,
title = {Beyond ‘one voice’? Global Europe's engagement with its own diversity},
author = {Gjovalin Macaj and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2014_BeyondOneVoice.pdf},
doi = {10.1080/13501763.2014.912148},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-06-16},
journal = {Journal of European Public Policy},
volume = {21},
number = {7},
pages = {1067-1083},
abstract = {This contribution stands as a conclusion to this collection, drawing on its empirical contributions as well as other examples of European Union (EU) foreign policy. We take the pursuit of a single voice as a core goal of EU foreign policy and ask under what conditions unity pays and conversely under what con- ditions it may be counterproductive. On this basis, we offer a systematic critique of the ‘one voice mantra’ correlating ‘EU unity’ and ‘EU influence’ in the global arena. We do so by distinguishing between, internally, the degree of convergence of interest between member states and, externally, the type of power relevant in the game being played. Only when interests converge and the external game is one where aggregative power matters is it plausible to assume that the pursuit of one EU voice serves the EU’s interests. At least in some cases, EU unity is not a pre- requisite for EU influence, and diversity can be a source of strength rather than weak- ness, internally as well.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This contribution stands as a conclusion to this collection, drawing on its empirical contributions as well as other examples of European Union (EU) foreign policy. We take the pursuit of a single voice as a core goal of EU foreign policy and ask under what conditions unity pays and conversely under what con- ditions it may be counterproductive. On this basis, we offer a systematic critique of the ‘one voice mantra’ correlating ‘EU unity’ and ‘EU influence’ in the global arena. We do so by distinguishing between, internally, the degree of convergence of interest between member states and, externally, the type of power relevant in the game being played. Only when interests converge and the external game is one where aggregative power matters is it plausible to assume that the pursuit of one EU voice serves the EU’s interests. At least in some cases, EU unity is not a pre- requisite for EU influence, and diversity can be a source of strength rather than weak- ness, internally as well.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Youngs, Richard
Europe’s Democratic Trilemma Journal Article
In: International Affairs, November 2014, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 1403-1419, 2014.
@article{Nicolaidïs2014,
title = {Europe’s Democratic Trilemma},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Richard Youngs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2014_EuropesDemocracyTrilemma_NicolaidisYoungs.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-00-00},
journal = {International Affairs, November 2014},
volume = {90},
number = {6},
pages = {1403-1419},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
A Demoicratic Conversation: An Interview with Kalypso Nicolaïdis Journal Article
In: St Antony’s International Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 8-21, 2014.
@article{Nicolaidïs2014b,
title = {A Demoicratic Conversation: An Interview with Kalypso Nicolaïdis},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Nicolaidis-STAIR-2014-1.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-00-00},
journal = {St Antony’s International Review},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {8-21},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
We, the Peoples of Europe Journal Article
In: Foreign Affairs, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 97-110, 2014, (Also available: “We, the Peoples of Europe”, in The Democratic Papers, British Council (Brussels), May 2004, pp. 20-32, URL: http://users.ox.ac.uk/%7Essfc0041/democraticpapers.pdf).
@article{Nicolaidïs2014e,
title = {We, the Peoples of Europe},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {users.ox.ac.uk/%7Essfc0041/Wethepeoplesofeurope.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-00-00},
journal = {Foreign Affairs},
volume = {83},
number = {6},
pages = {97-110},
note = {Also available: “We, the Peoples of Europe”, in The Democratic Papers, British Council (Brussels), May 2004, pp. 20-32, URL: http://users.ox.ac.uk/%7Essfc0041/democraticpapers.pdf},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Europe’s Ends Book Chapter
In: Wiesner, Claudia; Schmidt-Gleim, Meike (Ed.): The Meanings of Europe: Changes and Exchanges of a Contested Concept, pp. 236-259, Taylor & Francis, 2014, ISBN: 978-0-415-85706-2.
@inbook{Nicolaidïs2007f,
title = {Europe’s Ends},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Claudia Wiesner and Meike Schmidt-Gleim},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Europes-Ends-pdf.pdf},
isbn = {978-0-415-85706-2},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-00-00},
booktitle = {The Meanings of Europe: Changes and Exchanges of a Contested Concept},
pages = {236-259},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
2013
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Bellamy,; Staiger, (Ed.): UCL Publications 2013.
@online{Nicolaidïs2013c,
title = {Of Bread, Games and Gladiators: Why magic bullets will not placate EU citizens and why we should nurture a European demoicracy instead},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
editor = {Bellamy and Staiger},
url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2013_MagicBullets.pdf},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-12-00},
organization = {UCL Publications},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
Pragmatism, Idealism And European Demoicracy Online
Social Europe Journal 2013.
@online{Nicolaidïs2013,
title = {Pragmatism, Idealism And European Demoicracy},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {http://www.social-europe.eu/2013/07/pragmatism-idealism-and-european-democracy/},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-07-00},
journal = {Social Journal Journal},
organization = {Social Europe Journal},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso; Onar, Nora Fisher
The Decentring Agenda: Europe as a post-colonial power Journal Article
In: Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 283–303, 2013.
@article{Nicolaidïs2013d,
title = {The Decentring Agenda: Europe as a post-colonial power},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Nora Fisher Onar},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/The_Decentering_Agenda_Europe_as_a_Post.pdf},
doi = {10.1177/0010836713485384},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-06-00},
journal = {Cooperation and Conflict},
volume = {48},
number = {2},
pages = {283–303},
abstract = {The aim in this contribution is to amplify the call, articulated across a range of disciplines relevant to international politics, for a paradigm shift that decentres the study and practice of Europe’s international relations. Such a perspective is necessary both to make sense of our multipolar order and to reconstitute European agency in a non-European world. The analytical categories proposed in this article for a decentring agenda – provincialization, engagement and reconstruction(s) – can help to navigate the nexus of the empirical and the normative in such a decentring process. Applying the decentring logic to the EU’s own foundational narrative, the authors suggest that, only by acknowledging the inflections of colonialism in the EU project itself, can the Union reinvent its normative power in the 21st century.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The aim in this contribution is to amplify the call, articulated across a range of disciplines relevant to international politics, for a paradigm shift that decentres the study and practice of Europe’s international relations. Such a perspective is necessary both to make sense of our multipolar order and to reconstitute European agency in a non-European world. The analytical categories proposed in this article for a decentring agenda – provincialization, engagement and reconstruction(s) – can help to navigate the nexus of the empirical and the normative in such a decentring process. Applying the decentring logic to the EU’s own foundational narrative, the authors suggest that, only by acknowledging the inflections of colonialism in the EU project itself, can the Union reinvent its normative power in the 21st century.
Nicolaidïs, Kalypso
European Demoicracy and Its Crisis Journal Article
In: Journal of Common Market Studies , vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 351–369, 2013.
@article{Nicolaidïs2013b,
title = {European Demoicracy and Its Crisis},
author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},
url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Demoicracy-jcms-March-2013-1.pdf},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-03-00},
journal = {Journal of Common Market Studies },
volume = {51},
number = {2},
pages = {351–369},
abstract = {This article offers an overview and reconsideration of the idea of European demoicracy in the context of the current crisis. It defines demoicracy as ‘a Union of peoples, understood both as states and as citizens, who govern together but not as one,’ and argues that the concept is best understood as a third way, distinct from both national and supranational versions of single demos polities. The concept of demoicracy can serve both as an analytical lens for the EU-as-is and as a normative benchmark, but one which cannot simply be inferred from its praxis. Instead, the article deploys a ‘normative-inductive’ approach according to which the EU’s normative core - transnational non-domination and transnational mutual recognition - is grounded on what the EU still seeks to escape. Such norms need to be protected and perfected if the EU is to live up to its essence. The article suggests ten tentative guiding principles for the EU to continue turning such norms into practice.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article offers an overview and reconsideration of the idea of European demoicracy in the context of the current crisis. It defines demoicracy as ‘a Union of peoples, understood both as states and as citizens, who govern together but not as one,’ and argues that the concept is best understood as a third way, distinct from both national and supranational versions of single demos polities. The concept of demoicracy can serve both as an analytical lens for the EU-as-is and as a normative benchmark, but one which cannot simply be inferred from its praxis. Instead, the article deploys a ‘normative-inductive’ approach according to which the EU’s normative core - transnational non-domination and transnational mutual recognition - is grounded on what the EU still seeks to escape. Such norms need to be protected and perfected if the EU is to live up to its essence. The article suggests ten tentative guiding principles for the EU to continue turning such norms into practice.
Akkoyunlu, Karabekir; Nicolaïdis, Kalypso; Öktem, Kerem
The Western Condition: Turkey, the US and the EU in the New Middle East Online
2013.
@online{Akkoyunlu2013,
title = {The Western Condition: Turkey, the US and the EU in the New Middle East},
author = {Karabekir Akkoyunlu and Kalypso Nicolaïdis and Kerem Öktem},
url = {https://www.sant.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/thewesterncondition.pdf},
isbn = {978-0-9562098-6-3},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-00},
journal = {South East European Studies at Oxford (SEESOX)},
howpublished = {South East European Studies at Oxford (SEESOX)},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}