Articles and Book Chapters

@inbook{Nicolaidïs2012,

title = {Epilogue},

author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},

editor = {Kerem Oktem and Ayse Kadioglu and Mehmet Karli},

url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Turkey-as-Empire-Epilogue-Nicolaidis.pdf},

isbn = {978-6053992363},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-00-00},

booktitle = {Another Empire? A Decade of Turkey’s Foreign Policy Under the Justice and Development Party},

publisher = {Bilgi University Press},

address = {Istanbul},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Nicolaidïs2012b,

title = {The Idea of European Demoicracy},

author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},

editor = {Julie Dickson and Pavlos Eleftheriadis},

url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2013_TheIdeaofDemoicracy.pdf},

year  = {2012},

date = {2012-00-00},

volume = {Philosophical Foundations of EU Law},

publisher = {Oxford University Press},

address = {Oxford},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Nicolaidïs2011b,

title = {Towards Responsible Interdependence},

author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},

editor = {Miguel Poiares Maduro},

year  = {2011},

date = {2011-00-00},

booktitle = {An EU agenda for global governance},

publisher = {European University Institute},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Lacroix2010,

title = {European Stories: An Introduction},

author = {Justine Lacroix and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Justine Lacroix and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2010_EuropeanStories_Intro.pdf},

isbn = {9780199594627},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-10-00},

volume = {European Stories},

publisher = {OUP},

address = {Oxford},

abstract = {The editors provide a brief overview of debates over Europe and the European Union in the longue durée, and set the use of the term “intellectual” in historical context. They then question the (near) absence of intellectual debates on European integration during the Cold War, suggesting explanations for the paradox of an apparent loss of interest in discussing the European project just as it was becoming an institutional reality. The third section suggests that the myriad of visions and positions on the EU in the last two decades can be clustered around three distinct normative models – national, supra‐national, and transnational‐ (the first two being statist)– variants of which can be found across national contexts. Finally, the introduction provides an outline of the volume as a whole through an overview of its chapters.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Nicolaidïs2010d,

title = {Kir Forever? The Journey of a Political Scientist in the landscape of recognition},

author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},

editor = {Loic Azoulai},

url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/kir_forever.pdf},

year  = {2010},

date = {2010-00-00},

booktitle = {The Past and Future of EU Law; The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty},

publisher = {London: Hart Publishing},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Betts2009,

title = {The Trade-Migration Linkage: GATS Mode IV},

author = {Alexander Betts and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Matthew Eagleton-Pierce and Emily Jones and Kalypso Nicolaïdis

},

url = {https://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/materials/centres/cis/documents/compendium.pdf},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-07-00},

booktitle = {Building Blocks Towards a Global Trade Ethics},

pages = {65-75},

organization = {Oxford GTE Programme},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Eagleton-Pierce2009,

title = {Towards a Global Trade Ethics: Preliminary Building Blocks},

author = {Robert Howse and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Matthew Eagleton-Pierce and Emily Jones and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

url = {https://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/materials/centres/cis/documents/compendium.pdf},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-07-00},

pages = {6-15},

publisher = {Oxford GTE Programme},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Kleinfeld2009,

title = {Can a Post-Colonial Power Export the Rule of Law? Element of a General Framework},

author = {Rachel Kleinfeld and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Gianluigi Palombella and Neil Walker},

url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ROL-KleinfeldNicolaidis.pdf},

doi = {10.5040/9781472564634},

isbn = {978-1-4725-6463-4},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-00-00},

urldate = {2009-00-00},

booktitle = {Relocating the Rule of Law},

journal = {Relocating the Rule of Law},

pages = {139–170},

publisher = {Hart Publishing},

chapter = {7},

abstract = {The European dilemma in exporting the rule of law starts with the two faces of universalism: ‘our system is better than yours and should prevail’ and ‘you deserve what we have’. Is exporting the rule of law a by-product of conquest and domination or of transnational responsibility and cosmopolitan solidarity? What would it take for the EU to act as a genuine ‘post-colonial’ power in this realm, self-reflexive about the echoes of its colonial past and legitimate in the eyes of other countries? Be it as invaders, colonisers or traders, great powers have long viewed bringing their laws or even ‘The Law’ to other peoples as a mark of greatness. There was no higher honour Rome could bestow than bringing citizens from the edges of the Empire under the civilising shadow of Roman laws—which in turn became one of Rome’s enduring legacies to Europe. In the nineteenth century, the great European colonial powers exported their laws as ‘standards of civilisation’ to much of the world, whether directly colonised or the object of asymmetric treaties.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Anastasakis2009,

title = {Introduction: The long shadow of Europe},

author = {Othon Anastasakis and Kerem Öktem and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Othon Anastasakis and Kerem Öktem and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

url = {http://www.amazon.co.uk/long-shadow-Europe-Postnationalism-International/dp/9004171126},

isbn = {978-9004171121},

year  = {2009},

date = {2009-00-00},

booktitle = {In the Long Shadow of Europe: Greeks and Turks in the Era of Postnationalism},

publisher = {Republic of Letters},

series = {International Relations Studies Series},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Howse2008,

title = {Democracy without Sovereignty: The Global Vocation of Political Ethics},

author = {Robert Howse and Kalypso Nicolaidïs},

editor = {Tomer Broude and Yuval Shany},

url = {https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/the-shifting-allocation-of-authority-in-international-law-9781841137971/},

isbn = {9781841137971},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-06-13},

booktitle = {The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law},

pages = {163-191},

publisher = {Hart Publishing},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Pelabay200,

title = {One Union, One Story? In Praise of Europe’s Narrative Diversity},

author = {Janie Pelabay},

editor = {Alex Warleigh-Lack},

url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/One-Union-One-Story_-Nicolaidis-and-Pelabay.pdf},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-00-00},

volume = {Reflections on European Integration},

publisher = {Palgrave},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Nicolaidïs2008,

title = {Tensions in Transitional Justice},

author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs and Phil Clark and Zachary D. Kaufman},

editor = {Phil Clark and Zachary D. Kaufman},

url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/25741418},

year  = {2008},

date = {2008-00-00},

volume = {After Genocide},

publisher = {Columbia University Press/C. Hurst & Co.},

address = {New York/London},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Nicolaidïs2007g,

title = {Our Democratic Atonement: Why we Need an Agora Europe},

author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},

url = {https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Agora-Europe2007.pdf},

year  = {2007},

date = {2007-12-00},

urldate = {2007-12-00},

booktitle = {The People’s Project? New European Treaty and the Prospects for Future Negotiations},

pages = {90-99},

publisher = {European Policy Centre},

address = {Brussels},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Kelemen2007,

title = {Bringing Federalism Back In},

author = {Daniel Kelemen and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Knud Jørgensen and Mark Pollack and Ben Rosamond},

url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Nicolaidis-K-D-Kelemen-Bringing-Federalism-Back-In.pdf},

doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848607903.n16},

year  = {2007},

date = {2007-00-00},

urldate = {2006-00-00},

booktitle = {Handbook of European Union Politics},

pages = {301-316},

publisher = {London: SAGE Publications Ltd},

chapter = {15},

abstract = {In the past decade, comparative federalism has moved from the periphery of scholarship on the European Union to the mainstream. While pioneering scholars (see for instance Friedrich 1969; Forsyth 1981; Cappelletti et al. 1986; Scharpf 1988; Weiler 1991; Dehousse 1992; Sbragia 1992) have long applied insights from comparative federalism (or confederalism) to describe and explain the dynamics of European integration, the dominant theoretical perspectives on European integration rejected the relevance of federal comparisons. Intergovernmentalists had clear reasons to do so. From the intergovernmentalist perspective, European integration is driven by the same forces that explain the development of other international regimes (Moravcsik 1998), forces which differ in fundamental ways from the forces at work in domestic settings. From this ...},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Nicolaïdis2007c,

title = {Europe in the Mirror of the Mediterranean},

author = {Dimitri Nicolaïdis and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Thierry Fabre and Paul Sant Cassia},

url = {https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9780230002234},

isbn = {978-0-230-28733-4},

year  = {2007},

date = {2007-00-00},

booktitle = {Between Europe and the Mediterranean: The Challenges and the Fears},

pages = {162-194},

publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan UK},

abstract = {Historians, anthropologists, political scientists and demographers explore the principal challenges and fears characterizing relations between Europe and the Mediterranean. The contributors suggest that the greatest challenge facing our political generation is no longer forming a Europe without the Mediterranean, but with it.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Bunse2006,

title = {Big versus Small: Shared Leadership in the EU and Power Politics in the Convention},

author = {Simone Bunse and Paul Magnette and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Derek Beach and Colette Mazzucelli},

url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230599642_8},

doi = {10.1057/9780230599642_8},

isbn = {978-0-230-59964-2},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-01-00},

booktitle = {Leadership in the Big Bangs of European Integration},

pages = {134-157},

publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan, London},

chapter = {8},

abstract = {The European Union (EU) is a strange mix. A political construct conceived as a guard against the temptation of hegemony by any member state against any other(s), it relies most fundamentally on the ideal of shared leadership. In the EU, therefore, the principle of equality between states is not mainly grounded in the sovereignty norm as in classic intergovernmental organizations, but rather in the attempt to constrain power. At the same time, however, the EU obeys a stringent reality principle, whereby institutions and decisionmaking procedures must reflect power realities in order to be effective and credible. It would thus be hard to argue that the EU has transcended power politics: the taming of power is the best it can do. Thus, behind the ‘big versus small problem’, the conflicting views over institutional design between more and less populated member states, lies an age-old dilemma faced by all political communities, especially federal constructs (Magnette and Nicolaïdis 2004a).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Nicolaïdis2006,

title = {Constitutionalizing the Federal Vision?},

author = {Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Anand Menon and Martin Schain},

url = {http://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Constitutionalizing-Federal-Vision.pdf},

isbn = {9780199291106},

year  = {2006},

date = {2006-00-00},

booktitle = {Comparative Federalism},

pages = {59-92},

publisher = {OUP},

chapter = {4},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Magnette2005,

title = {Shared Leadership in the EU: Theory and Reality},

author = {Paul Magnette and Simone Bunse and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Deirdre Curtin and Alfred E. Kellerman and Steven Blockmans},

doi = {10.1007/978-90-6704-543-8_18},

isbn = {978-90-6704-200-0},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-01-00},

urldate = {2005-01-00},

booktitle = {The EU Constitution: The Best Way Forward?},

pages = {275-296},

publisher = {T.M.C. Asser Press},

abstract = {Since the French and Dutch voters rejected the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, in May and June 2005 respectively, politicians and lawyers have been confronted with the question of how to move forward. This book strives to formulate answers on the question of what to do if not all the Member States ratify the Treaty. It brings together contributions from over 50 experts from the 25 Member States, from candidate, potential candidate and neighbouring countries, as well as from Russia and the US. Key topics covered are: the process and impact of EU constitution-making; the democratic life of the EU; improving the efficiency and quality of legislation in the EU; the expansion of executive, judicial and legislative powers; and access to justice.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Nicolaïdis2005c,

title = {Globalization with Human Faces: Managed Mutual Recognition and the Free Movement of Professionals},

author = {Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {F. K. Padoa Schioppa},

url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230524354_4},

doi = {10.1057/9780230524354_4},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-01-00},

booktitle = {The Principle of Mutual Recognition in the European Integration Process},

pages = {129-189},

publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan},

abstract = {While short-term capital flows and foreign direct investment have never moved across borders so freely, neither has the international movement of people been so ‘managed’. This is one of the apparent paradoxes at the heart of today’s pattern of globalization. In an era of much-proclaimed liberalism, rules at the national level governing conditions for the granting of visas, work or residence permits, and ultimately permanent residence and naturalization, constitute perhaps the strongest remaining expression of state power. These rules are hardly subject to any international oversight, or even coordination, save in the restricted realm of asylum, where the national norms relating to the movement of people become subject to international human-rights norms. The paradox, of course, is only apparent. The weight of forces driving the liberalization of capital movement dwarfs those driving the free movement of people. More fundamentally, policies addressing migration, bound up as they are with the ‘who is “us”’, the definition of political as well as economic boundaries, and, ultimately, the flexibility or lack thereof of group identities, escape the sole constraint of economic rationality.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Meunier2005,

title = {The European Union as a Trade Power},

author = {Sophie Meunier and Kalypso Nicolaïdis},

editor = {Christopher Hill and Michael Smith},

url = {http://aei.pitt.edu/3307/},

year  = {2005},

date = {2005-00-00},

booktitle = {The International Relations of the European Union},

publisher = {Oxford University Press},

address = {Oxford},

abstract = {The EU is a formidable trade power. While trade liberalization internally and externally have always been the essence of European integration, successive enlargements and the creation of the European Single Market have turned the EU into the world’s largest trade power. The EU is responsible for making trade policy through a complex decisionmaking process that has often been contested politically but allows it to speak on behalf of its members in international trade negotiations. This chapter argues that not only does the EU derive some inherent power from trade, but that it is also increasingly prone to use trade as the backbone of its normative power. As a result the EU is now becoming a world power through trade, as one of the major actors shaping the multilateral trade agenda, and using access to its market strategically in order to obtain political concessions from its commercial partners. This chapter explores the determinants of the EU’s trade power (both inherent and normative) and examines the contribution of trade policy to the power of Europe in the international system, both in the context of the World Trade Organization and in the broader framework of international relations.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Nicolaidïs2004,

title = {Notre Démo-cratie européenne; Cette constitution est-elle une troisième voie pour l’Europe?},

author = {Kalypso Nicolaidïs},

url = {https://www.editions-lignes.com/L-EUROPE-EN-PARTAGE.html

http://users.ox.ac.uk/%7Essfc0041/Lignes-Constitution04.pdf},

year  = {2004},

date = {2004-02-00},

volume = {L’ Europe en Partage},

publisher = {Lignes-Léo Scheer},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}